Talk:Tax Policy Center

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

192.245.194.254 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Neutrality

Re the IP edit (see history): providing a source whose neutrality might be challenged by some doesn't look very unbiased to me. The Media Research Center is "a conservative content analysis organization" after all and it seems only natural that they will disgrace the political opponent. I hope someone can edit this article to a more neutral point of view. De728631 (talk) 02:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but The Urban Institute (Evaluate LBJ's "Great Society") and The Brookings Institution ("Best liberal think-tank in Washington") got together and formed the "non-partisan" Tax Policy Center???? Give me a break. 69.152.175.201 (talk) 00:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I might possibly believe "non-partisan". Technically it is true, in that there is (at least to my knowledge) no formal attachment to, or open endorsement of either party or its candidates. But non-biased? That's rather questionable. twfowler (talk) 20:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came to this article after hearing the following NPR story: http://www.npr.org/2015/02/02/383214913/obama-to-send-4-trillion-budget-to-congress The interview subject says (towards the end of the story) that the Tax Policy Center's analysis of the 2015 Obama budget proposal does not count income from capital gains as real income. That is an extreme far right position if ever there was one. I suggest that the far right commenters here and elsewhere stop whining that everything not far enough right for their taste is far left.--- Dagme (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, offspring of the Urban Institute and Brookings can't be non-partisan, but having read that NPR article I tend to agree with you. In the end the article isn't clear enough - are we talking about realized or unrealized capital gains? WeComeFromZoar (talk) 03:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For posterity

At some point someone will edit this (not me, I've given up on that sort of thing, always leads to revert wars), and there will be a revert, so for people who will come upon this in the future, I offer the following--

"In 2002, tax experts who had served in the Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton administrations established the Tax Policy Center to provide unbiased analysis of tax issues."

Translation-- a bunch of rich, powerful people got together to provide an "unbiased" analysis of issues that effect the poor and weak.

Watch this get deleted using some arcane WP rules. Long live the technocrats! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.158.85 (talk) 22:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you're looking for a think tank started by a bunch of poor and powerless people? Would they still be powerless - or even very poor - if they started a think tank? I guess what we need are more poor and powerless people who are influential and have a lot of money. 208.104.223.117 (talk) 10:42, 18 September 2012