Talk:Thady Quill

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Clean-up

This whole article looks and reads like it was cut and pasted from somewhere else. It contains no references and is overlong and full of rhetoric.Coolavokig (talk) 09:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aah no its a nice article (but should be changed if a cut and paste) I was told that Thady Quill had done a bit of work for the songwriter and turned down his wages in exchange for the song is there any truth to that? Mountainyman (talk) 21:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no source online from which this text is drawn, so it's not likely a copy/paste job. However, it doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. It has an inappropriate tone, lacks citations to reliable sources, and isn't composed in the house style. --SSBohio 03:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wholly agree with SSB. Current text reads significantly like OR/ESSAY. Unless can be cited and cleaned-up, I'm going to largely restore to this version (and even so, still tag the assertions made for further clean-up/cites/etc).Guliolopez (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK - Given that there were no other thoughts, I've gone ahead and removed the "essay style" observational and discursive text from the article. I've restored the earlier summary copy. However is still significantly lacking in VER sources. Guliolopez (talk) 22:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]