The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This article is related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This page is extensive and with an extensive number of references to go with that. A large amount of primary sources are currently used in this page. As of time of this post, I counted only about three sources that are totally secondary a few additional that are questionable since in one way or the other they're not totally independent from the LDS Church. Thanks -- Dmm1169 (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw WP:LDS/RS which clarifies a lot of things. For what I thought was primary sources, the usage is conditional: "It might be used for uncontroversial self-descriptions, but avoid using it as a source for exceptional claims. In general, a secondary source with a stronger consensus for reliability is preferred." Consequently, the context of how it's used has to be taken into consideration.
While a secondary source with stronger consensus is preferred, glancing through this, I'm seeing these sources (Newsroom, Church News, etc.) used for less controversial self-descriptions and not exceptional claims. I would like another opinion on the matter before removing the tag. Thanks!-- Dmm1169 (talk) 02:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My husband's family is from South Africa, and Lionel Helps, my grandfather-in-law, was a temple president there. My parents-in-law were active members in the LDS Church in Durban and in other cities. None of the references I used mentioned the Helps family though. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at COI criteria, it seems as long as you're bringing up factual information related to the topic, using independent sources and not talking about friends/family or using their journals, I think you're ok. Thanks - Dmm1169 (talk) 04:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]