Talk:The Last Dinner Party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge

Please compare and combine. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge – Thanks, page and draft compared and merged (social media citations in draft not merged). Tag removed Sexitoni (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Private school and fees[edit]

There is absolutely no reason for the first sentence in the article about this band to be a line about where one of the members went to school, not least how much it costs. The reason given is that it is mentioned in an article about the band, but it's Wikipedia policy that verifiability does not guarantee inclusion. The WP:ONUS to find consensus to include falls on the editor arguing for inclusion, and there has been no discussion of that so far so I'm opening this. @Woovee:, another revert will bring you beyond the WP:3RR - I'm not going to template a regular so I'm letting you know here, so rather than repeatedly edit warring to include this, could you explain why you think it's due for inclusion, let alone due to be the first sentence in this article? ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ser! I concur. glman (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. It seems like content that is more relevant for a separate article on Abigail Morris herself, and even then, you would need a good reason and other supporting evidence to justify discussing her "upper class" upbringing and the tuition cost of the school. And per WP:PAGEDECIDE I don't think there is enough to give the band members their own pages for now. As such, per WP:ONUS, the only other option should be to omit the information from the article. FanServ (talk) 01:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garth Crooks[edit]

The sentence about Garth Crooks praising them on Football Focus was added in November 2023 with a citation (Rolling Stone article) that doesn't contain that information. There are now two quality sources for it – The Guardian and the Times – but they're from February 2024, so might this be a citogenesis? Jös (talk) 15:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed text and citations. I think you are correct, therefore there is no primary source. The relevant Team of the Week column does not mention the band: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/67328197 Sexitoni (talk) 12:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article Class[edit]

Changed from 'C' to 'B'. It is clearly 'B' by any reasonable assessment. (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]