Talk:The Lottery (2010 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York City

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sources

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Fences&Windows 17:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

my edits on 6-18-10

Thank you for your editing. I tweaked a few items: The film is on charters in the context of the total public educational system, so I re-added the mention of public schools. I referred to the teachers' union rather than a teaching union, since the principals' union could also be considered a teaching union, but that's not the union that's the source of opposition on point. I edited a reference to the N.Y. Post to the non-template style because I'm not familiar with the template style and if you couldn't indicate the author's qualification and that someone provided additional reporting I assume the template didn't support those and describing that person as a coauthor is not what the publisher specified (I reaccessed the page today), so, for accuracy's sake, I used the non-template form, but updated the access date to yours. I edited the Variety reference to the non-template style to support pointing out that the article preceded the film's release (I don't know how to do that in the template), corrected the publication date (I reaccessed the source today), and updated the access date to yours. I corrected Daily Post to Daily News. I corrected Errol's name, added links, fixed a broken link (it was missing a bracket) and sidestepped a disambiguation page, removed a redundant link, added a category for Education in Manhattan to go with Education in the Bronx, decapitalized "Editor in chief" to conform to the articles on Susan Taylor and Essence, clarified a phrase (adding "charter"), and, minor, fixed a link to avoid a redirect, decapitalized a nontitular word, combined two paragraphs, edited one verb for consistency of tense, spaced list items, and added one serial comma. I'm glad you fixed my single-quotation-mark problems and what was probably my defaultsort error. Overall, the recent edits preceding mine are very helpful; there are a lot of good improvements. Thanks again. Nick Levinson (talk) 16:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Corrected 1 typo: Nick Levinson (talk) 16:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]