Talk:The Moth (Lost)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Moth (Lost)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BenLinus1214 (talk · contribs) 21:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello again. Give me a couple hours to read this article. BenLinus1214talk 21:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC) @Newyorkadam: Comments

  • I feel that the plot summary is a bit too long. Are there any details that you feel that you could cut out? It's clocking in at 863 words currently, and per WP:TVPLOT, plot summaries should be around 200 to 500 words. It's okay if it's a bit over that word count, but the bottom line is that it needs to be shorter.
  • Once again, for the caption in the production section, you need a period.
Green tickY
  • The second "Production" paragraph is too long and hard to navigate. Perhaps you could split it somewhere?
Let me know how that looks.
  • Is the entire second paragraph sourced to those three footnotes? If so, then it's probably a good idea to ref name those footnotes and place them throughout the paragraph. In particular, I think it would be a good idea for you to source direct quotes. It's a bit jarring when these quotes don't have a ref at the end of them, and it makes them look unsourced.
Green tickY
  • Your reference to "Pilot" in the reception section does not have an end quote.
Green tickY
  • You usually add something about the Los Angeles Times list of Lost episodes. Where is that in this article?

If you can clean this stuff up, then I'll pass it. :) BenLinus1214talk 00:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, I'll cut down the plot summary shortly. -Newyorkadam (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam
@Benlinus1214: I cut down the plot a bit— lemme know how that looks. Newyorkadam (talk) 15:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam
@Newyorkadam: That's good enough, but in future episode articles, keep it to a bit shorter length. The next two episodes look pretty good in that regard, and I'll review those two soon. Pass. BenLinus1214talk 23:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
@Benlinus1214: Thanks! I'll look into cutting those down a bit soon. -Newyorkadam (talk) 01:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Moth (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)