Jump to content

Talk:The Rifles (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Therifles bandlogo.png

[edit]

Image:Therifles bandlogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History section?

[edit]

The band's information is sloppy and outdated. There should be some sort of organized sections. I've seen several other band pages go about this differently...we could have "History" or "Career" or "No Love Lost (2004-2007) and Great Escape (2007-2009)" or something like that. Any ideas? Stewartdc8 (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can history be out dated? 90.221.196.56 (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was awhile ago, before there was even a history subsection or whatever, just a list of older things without current happenings. It's been updated since. Stewartdc8 (talk) 03:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Acoustic #1 ?

[edit]

The 2007-present part mentions the release of an acoustic album, "Acoustic #1". However it's not in the album list, nor e.g. on allmusic.com. What sort of a release is/was this, does anyone know? Maybe a fanclub-only thing? --Georgepauljohnringo (talk) 13:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


It was an acoustic album released exclusively on their uk tour. I guess it was sort of a thank you type opportunity for the fans. I suppose it could be added to the album list, just keep in mind it's not a studio album ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stewartdc8 (talkcontribs) 13:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]