Talk:The Secret of the Sword

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Animation: American / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

First film based on a toy franchise

I read somewhere that Raggedy Ann & Andy: A Musical Adventure was the first film - it was released back in 1977. Esn 20:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Film cut into episodes or episodes compiled into film?

it was later edited into the series' first five episodes

I was always under the impression that the first five episodes were written as such (and certainly the fact one has a different writing team reinforces this) and only put together as a film to a) capitalise on the success of the He-Man, b) make it easier to launch She-Ra overseas (where the cartoon may not yet have arrived) and c) boost sales.

Is there any evidence the story was conceived as a film from the outset? Timrollpickering 08:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I read somewhere that the first five episodes of the series had extra and/or longer scenes that were edited out of the theatrical release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.8.230.39 (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there are additional bits in the individual episodes - from recollection these are mainly longer versions of particular scenes. Timrollpickering (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The movie made $7.5 million. The $6.5 million box office intake noted on this page & by NYT is wrong.

According to IMDb https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089984/ , Box Office Mojo , and late Filmation President Lou Scheimer himself https://books.google.com/books?id=UROrDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=Tom+Sito+Mattel&source=bl&ots=-hrYWsS0wS&sig=ACfU3U2X7OrjjHpsa_IHutxSkn0s-_mfpA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjasaup5LTzAhUrFlkFHUUxAKoQ6AF6BAgPEAM#v=onepage&q=Tom%20Sito%20Mattel&f=false, the movie's final tally was over $7.5 million. The New York Times $6.5 million was an earlier estimate, & the wikipedia page should reflect the higher & more accurate total. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:150:4100:6b10:4457:8514:9a72:a028 (talk • contribs)

The film made $7.5 million, and records reflect this. I don't know why someone reverted it to hide that fact, but the redaction amounts to misinformation.

The movie made $7.5 million. The $6.5 million box office intake noted on this page & by NYT is wrong. According to IMDb https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089984/ , Box Office Mojo , and late Filmation President Lou Scheimer himself https://books.google.com/books?id=UROrDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=Tom+Sito+Mattel&source=bl&ots=-hrYWsS0wS&sig=ACfU3U2X7OrjjHpsa_IHutxSkn0s-_mfpA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjasaup5LTzAhUrFlkFHUUxAKoQ6AF6BAgPEAM#v=onepage&q=Tom%20Sito%20Mattel&f=false, the movie's final tally was over $7.5 million. The New York Times $6.5 million was an earlier estimate, & the wikipedia page should reflect the higher & more accurate total. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:150:4100:95b0:a583:373f:78aa:857e (talk • contribs)

You know that you’re spamming this talk page, right? You just repeated the exact same thing you posted above, there was no need to repeat yourself here. ‐⁠‑🌀⁠SilSinn^AL982100⁠💬 06:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]