Talk:The Spirit of '45

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Spirit of '45 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: British / Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Charles Moore and the BBC

OK, the qualifier you added was removed, with explanation. Instead of then trying to justify it via talk, you've just reverted that removal and put it back in again. What does Moore's stand on the BBC have to do with this? This comes across as at best a rather petty bid to have a POV go at Moore on an unrelated page and at worst little more than poisoning the well. Even a more general description of him as, say, a "conservative columnist" would be edging that way; plus, if we do it for him, why not for every other source cited? The "left-wing metropolitan listings magazine" Time Out? The "pro-public sector" Guardian newspaper? Your claim that he is an "extremist" is all well and good but that's your description and not a reason for singling him out for such a qualification. N-HH talk/edits 15:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Plus "for whom it is known that he went to such extreme as to refuse to pay for a public broadcasting service for disagreeing with its alleged leftist bias" is barely English. N-HH talk/edits 15:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, Moore's stance on the BBC has nothing to do with this article. The "qualifier" is POV pushing and should be removed.--Britannicus (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]