Talk:The Tempest (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article The Tempest (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
December 7, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Albums (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Hip hop (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Psychopathic Records (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Psychopathic Records, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Psychopathic Records and Insane Clown Posse on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join and contribute to the discussion.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

Toolbox

See WP:DEADREF
for dead URLs

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Tempest (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

yes.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    How reliable is thuglifearmy (This is a fan based site...)?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Dabsolver check: one dab solved (unlinked "giant" as common word)
  • Checklinks check: ok

Assessment[edit]

This article doesn't even meet "C" class criteria for the album Wikiproject. To meet "C" class, an album article needs a list of performers. To met "B" class, it needs a list of performers and technical personnel. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Assessment. This would meet the "start" class assessment of that project. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)