Talk:The Vüze

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

The building has since been renovated entirely on the exterior, and renamed The Vuze. Someone with more editing experience can update this hopefully — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.142.48.158 (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page should definitely have some synopsis of Hurricane Juan and its effect on the building. I'll try to pull something together and then post to the main page.

Should this article still be considered a stub? It's not that short anymore. Bosintang (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

Sentences like this:

Since the dire condition of the building is known throughout the Maritimes, it is very difficult to recruit Atlantic Canadian tenants. Thusly, Fenwick place is advertised to International and Upper Canadian students without mention of the current state of the building

or this:

the largest bedrooms are divided in half by a flimsy wall comprised of chipboard and foam insulation, as can be seen in the photograph at the bottom right of this page."

without references need to be removed. I sympathise with former editors about the state of Fenwick Place, but the article needs to be referenced properly and written in a neutral tone and with no original research. Quite a lot of this article could use some cleaning up. Bosintang (talk) 07:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just spent an hour doing so, removing offending bits, adding references and the like, so I've removed the tags. Cheers, Kinou (talk) 09:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fenwick Tower (Halifax). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]