Talk:The WB 100+ Station Group

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Are any of these "fictional" call letters used by real stations, or have they been reserved? Morwen - Talk 22:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The FCC has no recognition of these fictitious call signs. Sometimes, they do get assigned to real stations (e.g. KWBT is in Tulsa, Oklahoma, but there is a WB100+ channel KWBT in Eureka, California). These call signs are made up by the channel owners purely for marketing purposes. Though I'm sure that in most cases they probably try to avoid conflicting with real call signs. DHowell 05:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Future of The WB 100+

Update: [1] What I find most interesting is the apparent omission of Savannah in the CW's plans. 67.150.93.80 21:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another update: [2] This claims that "none of the Pappas deals involve CW Plus," but that supposedly includes KWBL and KWUB. Clarification? Morgan Wick 06:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WRWB

I removed WRWB, which had been added by an anon a while ago. I have done my own research and, contrary to the anon's claims, WRWB doesn't appear to show the WB 100+ schedule. Between the Daytime WB and WB Primetime, or from 5 to 8 PM, WRWB shows hour-long blocks of The King of Queens, Will and Grace, and Sex and the City in that order. By contrast, WFWB, which is most definitely part of the WB 100+, shows the Bernie Mac Show, Yes Dear, and The King of Queens. Will and Grace and Sex and the City air after primetime. The equivalent 10 PM-midnight time on WRWB is taken up by That 70's Show and South Park. Neither one of those shows airs regularly on weekdays on WFWB. In my view, if it shows the WB 100+ schedule it's WB 100+, if it doesn't it's not; thus there is no "controversy" whether it is or not. Morgan Wick 22:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finding Station Logos

Since most of the WB 100+ Plus stations do not have websites (besides the shared www.thewbpass.com), it is hard trying to find the station logos. However, this may get easier because of a recent discovery of a website that provides these logos. The website web address: http://www.thewbpass.com/wbpass/ns04/images/siblogos2005/****.gif displays them. To find a certain logo, enter the call letters (all in lower case) of the station where the four stars "****", are located in the web address. As some stations have been announced as becoming CW Plus affiliates, their new CW logos, if they have them, cannot be found using this WB Pass logo website.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kowh.png

Image:Kowh.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]