Talk:The Western Australian Naturalist

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Western Australian Naturalist is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Academic ?[edit]

The Western Australian Naturalists membership were in some part professionals, but there was a considerable number of membership who were enthusiastic ammateurs - I find the adding of the Academic journal tag problematic JarrahTree 09:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific journals are a subset of academic journals. The primary occupation of a majority of authors doesn't really matter much. --Randykitty (talk) 10:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for that JarrahTree 10:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the Western Australian scientific community[edit]

This article and the subject of the article are very notable by any standard and does not deserve the tag - however as I sold my set of the full run, I need to check the physical set in the state library over the next week or so. JarrahTree 11:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First location of[edit]

@JarrahTree: According to the article

The Naturalist was the first location of:

Pseudemydura umbrina - description of the short necked tortoise

Atrichornis clamosus - details of the rediscovery of the noisy scrub bird

Myobatrachus gouldii - description and habits of the frog

Macroderma gigas - giant ghost bat

I doubt that members of these species were literally discovered between the pages of the journal, so I presume that the journal was the "first location" of the description/details rather than Pseudemydura umbrina (etc) itself. A slight rewording of the bullet points here might be in order.

I'd fix it myself of course, except that according to the categories of the target articles, Myobatrachus gouldii was described in 1841, and Macroderma gigas was described in 1887 - both well before The Western Australian Naturalist was established in 1947, suggesting that the Naturalist might not have been the first location of the description of those species. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not original description - but elaborations - further descriptions beyond the original JarrahTree 12:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]