Talk:Top Third Ventures
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I Did a Bit of Work, but This Article Needs More
[edit]I cleaned things up a bit - edited for neutrality, cleaned up the refs, etc., but this article really needs some references from reliable sources to establish notability. I did a quick search, but did not see any good refs at first glimpse. If anyone knows of any, please help. Ping me on my talk page or ask a question at the Teahouse if you need any help. Thanks! Ebikeguy (talk) 18:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Company seems awfully quiet
[edit]I helped fund their Baker Stove effort on Indiegogo many years ago, but it seems like they've dropped off the map and may not deserve an article - http://www.topthirdventures.com/ is a dead link. I did find the company on LinkedIn tho. II | (t - c) 05:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Notability is not a transient thing. If what they did in the past is notable, then they should retain the article and we should do a better job of showing their notability. If what they had done wasn't notable, then why did they have an article in the first place? Rockphed (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)