Talk:Traiectum (Utrecht)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Traiectum (Utrecht) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
out of traiectum
[edit]Classically Utrecht grew out of a settlement that was "out of Trecht" (Dutch uit/uut like English Out), a movement of the settlement due to moving of rivers. 88.159.77.240 (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- What change to the article do you suggest above?? Also what reliable source do you have for your suggestion? Arnoutf (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Wrong limits of the fort
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/38/Begrenzingskaart_castellum_Traiectum_Utrecht_Domplein.jpg/200px-Begrenzingskaart_castellum_Traiectum_Utrecht_Domplein.jpg)
Be careful! This map is a pure product of fantasy. The real limitation of the fort is to be found in the relevant specialist publications. This map should not be used in any Wikipedia essay. --Hartmann Linge (talk) 23:50, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
- Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
- C-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- C-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles