Talk:Transport in Guntur

India: Andhra Pradesh / Transport Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Transport in India workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This redirect has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This redirect was last assessed in May 2012.

Merge proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge Train Transit in Guntur and Bus Transit in Guntur to this page was in favor within 30 days of proposal mentioned. Vin09 (talk) 06:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Train Transit in the city refers to trams, metros or Monorails. But the city doesn't have any such thing. So the title isn't justified. The info needs to be merged with Transportation in Guntur or Guntur Railway Division as the whole info is about the divisional info and routes of lines and stations outside the district. Even for the larger cities there is no such page like for hyd or vijayawada or vizag. If the guntur have any inner city transits, this page suits it. So, please merge it with other pages as suggested above. Any comments?Vin09 (talk) 13:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bus Transit in the city is mostly described in the transportation in guntur page, needless of creating separate page for each transport, there is no other city which is larger than this is having so many pages for an article with the same meaning. I propose Bus Transit in Guntur be merged with Transportation in Guntur as the whole info is about transportation and created different pages with the same meaning. Guntur does not have any BRTS services that run in the city to separately describe it. Merge will make the page with good info at one place. Any comments?Vin09 (talk) 03:46, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Page is largely dominated by 4 photos. It will be betterment for the article if it has been merged. OccultZone (Talk) 05:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Transport in Guntur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100413073009/http://scrailway.gov.in/web/scrt.htm to http://scrailway.gov.in/web/scrt.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]