Talk:Tupolev Tu-12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Tupolev Tu-12 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
March 20, 2011 Good article nominee Listed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-12/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 01:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Doin...

Not so much.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Before I pass the article, I was wondering if there is any missing information, because there is only one article with prose. CrowzRSA 02:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
    • I don't understand. What do you mean only one article with prose?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
      • Sorry, I meant section. I mean, most articles have at least two. CrowzRSA 21:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
        • I added a subsection.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
          • It does look a little better, but should the section be renamed History, and the section below it be made into a subsection named Development. Like this:
History
Development
Testing and evaluation
          • CrowzRSA 01:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
            • Seems rather elaborate for a five-paragraph article. And the testing is usually part of the development process.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:50, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
              • Okay. CrowzRSA 18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Result
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    CrowzRSA 18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)