This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. VfD tag rm'd from article on 12 July by User:Duncharris but not mentioned here. Therefore, no counting of votes offered by me (though it's pretty obvious). -Splash 02:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
The contents of this article is silly nonsense (possibly even a candidate for BJAODN!) written by an anon IP. Perhaps, there ought to be a proper article about the Turnbull surname here, but I don't really have the inclination to do it and don't think it would be read by anybody if I did. Therefore, I suggest the article should be deleted.NicholasTurnbull 6 July 2005 23:32 (UTC)
I can see why this article would concern you ;-) Delete, nonsense. Dcarrano July 7, 2005 00:01 (UTC)
Update: a quick search of Wikipedia finds 13 people and 1 river named Turnbull. I'm just going to go ahead and throw those in the article... and the other stuff can be deleted anytime. -- BD2412talk July 7, 2005 01:27 (UTC)
Keep the disambig Good work, BD2412. -- Jonel | Speak 7 July 2005 03:52 (UTC)
Keep the very well done disambig. Thanks for doing that, BD2412. --NicholasTurnbull 7 July 2005 17:30 (UTC)
Keep: Now that it's a proper disambig page, good job! -- CABHANTALKCONTRIBS 7 July 2005 17:37 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.