Jump to content

Talk:Undue influence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Undue Influence:(Undue means unecessary or something more than required)and (influenc means convincing power).A contract is said to be induced by undue influence "where the relation subsisting bt the parties are such that one of the parties in a position to dominate the will of other by using the power of the position". I explain it in easy way to make everybody understandable☺️ Undue influence-two parties are include in this(1. 😢weak party(2. 😎Strong party Jismein strong party 😎apni power ka use krke weaker party se uski will ke against usse kaam karvate hai or unfair advantage leti hai SOME IMP.POINTS from definition: 1.their must be relation bt parties. 2.postion to dominate the will of other party. 3.must obtain unfair advantage. Example: A is an advocate and B is client.Here the relationship bt the parties such that A can dominate the will of be by charging unreasonable fees for his professional services. This example clear the points that there is1. relation bt the parties 2. position(advocate power)3.obtain unfair fees. Thanks☺️for giving a Chance😊

Allen Steed in the (FLDS leader) Warren Jeff trial

[edit]

This is the argument the prosecution used in the FLDS trial. They argued that even if the 14 year old lowered or eventually allowed sex, this allowance was void because of the undue influence as priesthood leaders of Warren Jeff (as prophet of the organization) and of Allen Steed (as priesthood leader of the home). "No force necesary to overcome a fouteen year old girl." Mokru 23:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Separation of Church and State

[edit]

Does alleged violation of Church-State separation count as undue influence ? In 1961, John F. Kennedy overcame fear among some voters that putting a Catholic in the White House would give the Vatican undue influence in the country’s affairs. ADM (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read the article. It's about the influence of one individual over another. bd2412 T 16:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What about John XXIII over Kennedy ? ADM (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Did they know each other on a personal level? bd2412 T 17:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think so. [1] He also knew Paul VI quite well. [2] ADM (talk) 17:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]