Talk:United States Public Health Service

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Rewrite should be in order

The Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) is not the sole being or identity of the "Public Health Service." PHS does not exist so much as an independent organization as it once did before the creation of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Health Education and Welfare (HEW). Today, PHS is only the Operating Divisions (OPDIV) and Staff Divisions (STAFFDIV) under the Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH), and the Commissioned Corps. Organizationally and politically, these OPDIVs and STAFFDIVs have more statutory reporting authority to Congress now than to the ASH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.162.30 (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CORPS IS THE UNIFORMED COMPONENT (personnel system) OF PHS, NOT PHS

Organizationally and in statute, the Commissioned Corps is NOT the PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, but rather the uniformed personnel system of PHS. This is a common mistake, and this MUST be changed. PHS is still authorized under The Public Health Service Act, which is Title 42 USC. Take a look at the "official HHS" definition: <http://www.hhs.gov/about/opdivs/phs.html>

USPHS vs PHSCC and Dr. Billings

The listing of the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps as related to the Public Health Service should be clarified more than what it is now. PHSCC is NOT an official designation of the Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service. The departmental/cabinet level history of the Corps is very obscure, but important. The earliest history of the PHS is tied to the Department of the Treasury. It wasn't until the Department of Health, Education and & Welfare was established that PHS was removed from Treasury.

The history of Dr. John Shaw Billings as related to the history of the Marine Hospital Service and later the Public Health and Marine-Hospital Service, which later became the Public Health Service I believe is largely overstated. Historically, Billings opposed the idea that the Marine-Hospital Service would have any charge of national health. It was under Billings and other key players of the post Civil-War era that established the little known National Health Board. Billings, a competing figure to Woodworth, likely did not care for the direction the Marine-Hospital Service was going. Litterally, PHS's early history was Plagues and Politics.

USPHS vs PHSCC?

I'll admit, I'm confused. :) There seems to be overlap between United States Public Health Service and Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. I thought the PHSCC was the "uniformed" part and the PHS is the "regular government agency who wear ties part". I'm going to start the research squirrels working on this, digging thru the government websites. PHS Historian, the domain says USPHS, but the site says PHSCC, Dept of HHS, and the US Code. — MrDolomite | Talk 02:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From my understanding from similar research, one must think of it as this way. For example, The United States Navy falls under the Department of Defense. The United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps falls under the United States Public Health Service. Both the Navy and PHSCC, commission officers with the exact same ranks and pay grades. There are only two main differences. The Navy is part of the DoD and the PHSCC is part of the PHS (or USPHS). The other is that PHSCC officers are considered noncombatants unless they are militarized by the President. Neovu79 (talk) 06:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Okay, now I know where you're confused. The PHS is the main division of the Department of Health and Human Services. All other agencies fall under the PHS including the PHSCC. So in other words, the Assistant Secretary for Health has operational contol over the other agencies and only answers to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services. Neovu79 (talk) 08:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intro paragraph needs work

The first paragraph is too history-focused. It should ideally state briefly what are the CURRENT responsibilities of the USPHS and maybe mention history briefly. 209.150.255.133 14:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:USPHS.gif

Image:USPHS.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is there mention of John Shaw Billings?

In John Shaw Billings' article, he is quoted as being "best known as the "father" of the United States Public Health Service," however, I see no mention of him in the USPHS article. Was he *really* the "father of the USPHS," or is his biography in error? Cbjohnny 23:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of our nation?

The mission of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps is to protect, promote, and advance the health and safety of our Nation.

Not everyone who reads this is necessarily a US citzen.

Not everyone maybe a US Citizen, but one would hope that with a title like U.S. Public Health Service that would imply the US, correct?

Why naval uniforms?

The article states that health service uniforms are similar (nearly identical) to naval uniforms but fails to explain why. That seems a curious omission. What is the reason?

The REASON(s) why Officers of the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service wear a Navy style uniform is because the original mission of the organization was to care for sailors of the U.S. Navy (1798-1811) and Merchant sailors. In addition, the Corps also had a vast fleet of ships used for Quarantine work. When the Marine-Hospital was reorganized under Woodworth, he placed personnel in uniforms to maintain control and respect in the hospitals, and this eventually lead to the mobile Corps we have today.

As another interesting note, the Public Health Service wore the khaki uniform as a regularly authorized uniform 12 years prior to the Navy authorizing the khaki uniform. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.162.30 (talk) 18:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uniforms of the Corps in General

The original uniforms as authorized for wear in 1890 were based off of Navy uniforms. The two reasons in which the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service wore the Navy style uniforms is: 1. Marine-Hospitals where merchant mariners would understand and respect the rank of an officer when providing treatment and 2. the Public Health Service at one point had several quarantine vessels, which the officers were in command of these vessels for the express purpose of carrying out the mission of the National Quarantine Program. Moreover, officers of the Service were and still are the Medical Corps of the Coast Guard (Revenue Cutter Service). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.162.30 (talk) 05:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ranks of the Uniformed Services vs. PHS

There is a very good comparison of all the US uniformed services here: [1] Since I'm not used to the conventions of Wikipedia editing, I'll suggest here that this would be a good addition to USPHS (as well as to [2] (section 6.2)) Torrmundi (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

"The Public Health Service Act of 1944 structured the United States Public Health Service (PHS), founded in 1798, as the primary division of the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW), (which was established in 1953)" How could an act dated 1944 structure the PHS as part of an agency that wasn't created until 1953? 24.61.4.237 (talk) 17:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States Public Health Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

scheme

or organigram, or depart-service-office hyerarchy: shouldn't USPHS offices be in the USDHHS navbox at the bottom? should't USPHS include the National Institutes of Health? ※ Sobreira ◣◥ (parlez) 22:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]