This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
The party's political position in contemporary context is clear, it was on the right, and other parties and orgnaizations were far-right (even banned for a while), regardless today both formations would be considered far-right, we should not mix terminology of totally different historical eras.(KIENGIR (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC))[reply]
I am Unsure. I would personally not call the Unity party (or indeed the majority of the Horthy Government) "Far-right" Especially for the time. What are wikipedia's official rules, if any, on whether it should be considered "Right-wing" or "Centre-right" for the time or "Far-right" by Today's circumstances. It begs the question. Perhaps if Progressivism keeps accelerating into the Future the Centre-Left parties of Today might Seem "Far-right" by the people of the Future, or they could not. That's not the question though. what is the stance Wikipedia says? Fishchaircan (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
