Talk:Uzunköprü
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uzunköprü article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Uzunköprü. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090220101900/http://uzunkopru.gen.tr/ to http://www.uzunkopru.gen.tr/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:10, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Removal of Turkish name
[edit]Cplakidas removes the text for the Turkish name "Edirne", which follows the city's conquest by the Ottomans denoting the renaming. This a fact, and the original phrase was in the right place. I've reverted the removing edit of Cplakidas. However, he reverted my edit again. What was wrong with the original text? Is it a Greek ressentiment only? CeeGee 13:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- [sarcasm] Drat, you found me out... [/sarcasm] No CeeGee, the removal of the Turkish name "Edirne" was not the object of my edit; my intention was to add a link to the article Ottoman conquest of Adrianople, rather than the redlink and the wrong date that were there before. But of course, if you see a Greek user doing something in a Turkish article, it has to be sinister, right? So it is always justified to do immediately a blind revert, without explanation, and without stopping to look if there are merits in the edit.... Ever heard of WP:AGF? Not everyone is out to get you, you know, and contrary to what the Turkish press may report, we Greeks don't plot every hour of every day to undermine Turkey (we do take the weekends off...).
- Feel free to add "Edirne" as many times as you want here, elsewhere, anywhere really, it doesn't bother me, but please keep the link to the article on the conquest, it took me some time to find some proper sources for it and bring it to a halfway decent state. --Constantine ✍ 14:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)