Talk:Van Winkle's correlation
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 November 2020. The result of the discussion was merge. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 26 July 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Van Winkle's Correlation → Van Winkle's correlation – No reason for capitalisation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Duh – why are we having an RM discussion about an obvious move that's not blocked? Dicklyon (talk) 01:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.