Talk:Variation of Trusts Act 1958

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Variation of Trusts Act 1958 has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
February 8, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 13, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that other than "incapable" beneficiaries, the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 only allows the courts to alter trust documents for potential beneficiaries, not confirmed ones?
WikiProject Law (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject United Kingdom (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Variation of Trusts Act 1958/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BencherliteTalk 11:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this one over the next couple of days, if that's OK. BencherliteTalk 11:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Prose - I've made a few, not many, changes. I think the only comment / question I have is this - who is Petre Crowder, and why did he introduce the Act?
    A member of Parliament, and no idea. Now fixed. Ironholds (talk)
  • Broadness / focus / stability / neutrality - all fine
  • Sources - all look reliable, but I can't spot-check for accuracy / copyvio as most of the article is based on offline sources. Not expecting any problems here, though. The article is well-referenced.
  • No images, nor would I expect any.

Perhaps just clarify who Crowder is, and double-check my amendments, then it's a GA I think. BencherliteTalk 13:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. Good enough for a GA pass, so well done you. BencherliteTalk 17:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)