Talk:Veronica Vera

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Veronica Vera article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 10 January 2011 by reviewer Gfoley4 (talk · contribs).

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request for comment

Closing per a WP:ANRFC request.
There is a clear consensus to merge Miss Vera's Finishing School For Boys Who Want to be Girls and Miss Vera's Finishing School for Boys Who Want to Be Girls (book) into this article. (And this was already done.) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

removed RFC tag - Mark Bassett Currently there exist three brief articles that basically repeat each other with only minor modifications: Veronica Vera, Miss Vera's Finishing School For Boys Who Want to be Girls, and Miss Vera's Finishing School for Boys Who Want to Be Girls (book). I had previously placed merge templates on these articles, but that didn't draw much comment, so I am now opening this RFC to see whether we can arrive at a consensus to merge the three articles here. The only comment on the merge proposal came from Joe Decker (see here). --Randykitty (talk) 11:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need anyone's permission to merge low traffic articles. Feel free to be WP:BOLD. The worst that could happen is someone reverts you, which is part of the WP:BRD cycle. PraetorianFury (talk) 17:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In principle you are right. However, if you check the history of the article on the book, I already tried that and was reverted. And as stated above, the merge discussion that I started hardly attracted any participants. The article creator has removed the merge tags, had already done that once before, and also reverted the earlier redirect/merge. Hence I'd prefer to have a clear consensus to merge three articles before proceeding further at this point. --Randykitty (talk) 18:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: Each article is a stub and it doesn't seem that any of them could be much more than that on their own. Also, as noted, much of the information is repeated and they all seem very similar. Not really a question here, they should be merged. Chris1834 (talk) 14:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given the support here and on the other talk pages, I've gone ahead and merged the three here. --Randykitty (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inoticed the discussion is over but this still had rfc tag, so I have removed thit. Markbassett (talk) 13:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.