Talk:Viral neuronal tracing

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses Mid‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PeachOP.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to Delete "Virus life cycle" Section

This section, while informative, seems too general in the context of specifically viral tools to trace the brain. Much of this information can be found in the virus page. I propose to delete this section and redistribute the information specific to neurotropic viral infection to the "Methods" section under infection. If the more general life cycle of viruses is helpful in understanding the technique, I will leave it in (and begin adding citations). But, if I don't receive any feedback in the next 3 days, I will move forward with deleting the section.

PeachOP (talk) 16:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Changes to Article Structure

Hi all, I believe that this article could be better organized, especially to reflect the typical structure I've observed in other scientific techniques (an example being optogenetics), where the article starts with a "History" section, then goes on to explain methodology. As such, I propose the following changes:

Current Structure: Background of neural tracing -> Virus life cycle -> Direction of transmission -> Methods -> Benefits and drawbacks -> current uses -> Viruses in use

Potential Reworked Structure: History -> Methods -> Direction of transmission -> Benefits and drawbacks -> Viruses in use

Changes/justification:

Change "Background..." to "History" to match other articles
Remove the "Virus life cycle" section (see previous post)
Move "Methods" to after History. I feel Methods should be one of the first sections because the article is about a technique
Remove "Current Uses" and move information there to lead section. No new information is presented except for the last sentence which summarizes findings. I propose to move that sentence to the lead section, and delete the remaining section (at least until more work is done documenting current uses)

Overall, I think these changes will lead to a better organized article which, after explaining the origins of viral tracing, follows sequentially through the action of the virus from how it is introduced to the brain, to how it spreads.

I am open to discussion of how best to organize this article. But, if I don't receive any objections in the next 3 days, I will move forward with the changes.

PeachOP (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]