This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
For those wondering why this isn't two articles - been there, done that, here's the t-shirt: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Nye And yes, we're all well aware of the numerous articles which remain for Republican nominees (and Libertarians, as they're apparently not a threat). The Admins consider this double standard just another tee-hee giggle button - sleazy but true. At least Mark Kirk's intern was identified in time for his requested deletion of the Dan Seals article to be stopped (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Seals (Congressional Candidate)). But was he blocked for malicious vandalism? No, they just let him change his user name from Keeleysam to KUsam so he could be more 'anonymous' (Wikipedia:Changing username/Archive47). Nice. Flatterworld (talk) 13:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
