Talk:Virgo Supercluster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon Virgo Supercluster is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
WikiProject Cosmology (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Virgo Supercluster is within the scope of WikiProject Cosmology, which collaborates on articles related to physical cosmology on Wikipedia.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Formation and evolution[edit]

Is a section on Formation and evolution required? See the equivalent entry under Galaxy. This could be included within the Structure section. Presumably the process of development of the disc structure corresponds to the formation of structures at other orders of magnitude - such as disc galaxies and protoplanetary discs --Tediouspedant (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Apparent size criterion[edit]

What is considered "large" apparent size? Ardric47 02:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

There's some arbitrary cut-off in terms of angular size: 100 arcseconds. I modelled our list after the one in, which also uses this cut-off. It keeps the listing from including heavy but very distant clusters that have been relatively poorly observed. -- Xerxes 01:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Great attractor[edit]

"The local (Coma-Virgo), Perseus-Piscus, Hydra-Centaurus, Orphiuchus, Vela, and a number of other superclusters are observed to move towards the Great Attractor as speeds of greater than 600,000 km per second," Isn't this about 3 times the speed of light?

It's twice the speed of light. Although it's possible for different parts of the universe to be moving away from each other at faster-than-light speeds (by some definitions) due to the expansion of space, I'm suspicious about that happening so close to us. Ardric47 00:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
You don't want to know. Or maybe you do. This might possibly be harnessed somehow for future spaceships. This is better than an Scramjet!--20pxMac Lover Talk 17:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Group/cluster list[edit]

The group/cluster member list is a mess. Moreover, this list gets really messy when considering the difficulty in identifying whether galaxies are parts of groups (see the Sombrero Galaxy under "Environment") and the difficulty in distinguishing whether galaxies are subdivided into small groups or combined together into large groups (see my revisions to the M101 Group article and the section labelled "Nearby groups"). This section could be misleading or confusing, and its accuracy will always be questionable, so I am removing the section. GeorgeJBendo 21:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Galaxy clouds of the Virgo Supercluster

  • Virgo cluster (disk component)
  • Canes Venaciti Cloud (disk component)
  • Virgo II Cloud (disk component)
  • Leo II Cloud (halo component)
  • Virgo III Cloud (halo component)
  • Crater Cloud (halo component)
  • Leo I Cloud (halo component)
  • Leo Minor Cloud (halo component)
  • Draco Cloud (halo component)
  • Antilia Cloud (halo component)
  • NGC 5643 Cloud (halo component)

Groups and Clusters of the Virgo Supercluster

Sorted by the number of galaxies they contain with large apparent size:

I think there should be a Members of the Virgo Supercluster article with that list, fleshed out, with notes on why some may or may not be members of the LSC. (talk) 11:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


There were complaints that Image:Local_supercluster.jpg (the image on the right) was unreadable because it used km, so I made one using light years instead: Image:Local_supercluster-ly.jpg. Hairy Dude 01:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Do you have references for all of the distance measurements in that figure? For that matter, are those terms for various clusters of galaxies actually in use (i.e. have those terms been used in a scientific journal article published in the past 10 years)? If the answer to either of these questions is no, then maybe the picture should not be used. Dr. Submillimeter 18:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
The orgiginal image created by nasa had distance measurements in it in km. Performing a simple unit conversion is allowed. McKay 16:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
A NASA public outreach website may not be the best source of information for this data. I would contend, for example, that some of these designations are not in use. For example, a search for "Draco Group" in professional astronomy journals with the ADS Abstract Service turns up no articles that use the term. I would also like to see references from journal articles for the distances. The distance to Messier 81 and Messier 82 given by [3], which are part of the M81 Group, is 11.5-11.8 Mly, not 11 Mly as shown in this figure. Similarly, the distance to Messier 51 in the M51 Group is given by [4] is 23 Mly, not the 31 Mly shown in this figure. I sincerely recommend deleting it, as it is inaccurate. Dr. Submillimeter 17:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


A list of (some) members should be included, and the major divisions of the LSC... (halo, disc, etc)... there's this Leo Spur and Local Sheet... and is the Local Void part of the LSC, or next to it? (talk) 09:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


I'd like to propose that we rename this page 'Local Supercluster' instead of 'Virgo Supercluster.' Most of the literature uses this name, I believe in part to distinguish this structure from the 'Virgo cluster,' it's main constituent. 'Local Supercluster' has the advantage of being completely unambiguous, standing by analogy with the 'Local Group.' Vegasbri (talk) 18:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Gsearch Local Supercluster 459000 ghits
Gsearch Virgo Supercluster 112000 ghits
GScholar Local Supercluster 250 ghits
GScholar Virgo Supercluster 31 ghits
GBooks Local Supercluster 287 ghits
GBooks Virgo Supercluster 52 ghits (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
I agree with the proposed move.—RJH (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Old version of article[edit]

The Virgo Supercluster

The Virgo Supercluster or Local Supercluster is the galactic supercluster that contains the Local Group, the latter containing, in its turn, the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies.

Disk and halo

The Supercluster consists of two components: disk component and halo component. The flattened disk component has a pancake-like shape, and contains 60% of the Virgo Supercluster's luminous galaxies. The halo component consists of many elongated objects, and contains the remaining 40% of the Virgo Supercluster's luminous galaxies.


The diameter of the Supercluster is about 200 million light years; it contains about 100 groups and clusters of galaxies and is dominated by the Virgo cluster near its center. Our Local Group is located near the edge and is being drawn inward toward the Virgo cluster[1]. It is still unclear if at some time in the far future, the Local Group and other galactic clusters will be "eaten" by the very massive Virgo A Galaxy[2].


By tracking its gravitational effect on the movement of galaxies, one can estimate that the total mass of the Virgo Supercluster is about 1015 solar masses (2 × 1046 kg; see Orders of magnitude (mass)). As its luminosity is far too small for this number of stars, it is thought that a large part of its mass is dark matter.

The entire Virgo Supercluster is being pulled toward a gravitational anomaly known as the Great Attractor, which lies near the Norma cluster.


The Virgo Supercluster is subdivided into groups of clusters called galaxy clouds. Three clouds are on the disk component: Virgo cluster, Canes Venatici Cloud and Virgo II Cloud. The halo consists of many elongated clouds pointing toward the Virgo Cluster.


  1. ^ This is due to the so-called Virgo-centric flow towards the center of the supercluster. For details, see [1]
  2. ^ See The Virgo Cluster and the Local Group of Galaxies at [2]
  • Brent Tully: The Local Supercluster, Astrophys. J., vol. 257, pp. 389-422 (1982)
  • Oscar Monchito: Superclusters and Other Stuff, Colton, vol. 12, pp. 124-118 (1992)

Further reading

External links

See also

Category:Virgo Supercluster Category:Galaxy superclusters

Here's the pre-rewrite version of the article (w/o the clickable maps) (talk) 02:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Too many maps[edit]

There's an overabundance of computer-generated maps. Should there be a least one image that is taken by a telescope in this article?-- (talk) 01:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

mass contradiction[edit]

I was curious to find what percentage of the mass of Virgo Supercluster is within the Virgo Cluster. It says that the Virgo Supercluster has mass of 10^15 solar masses, and on the article of Virgo Cluster, it says it has mass of 1.2 time 10^15 solar masses. This is absurd, the Virgo Cluster is a part of Virgo Supercluster, and yet Virgo Cluster is heavier. Can someone fix the article, and add information about mass distributions? Is the mass distribution predicted to be the same as luminousity distributions discussed in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nnnu (talkcontribs) 11:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

It looks to me like Virgo Supercluster currently interprets the current source for the mass of the Virgo Supercluster incorrectly. Right now Virgo Supercluster currently says the mass is 10^15 solar masses, but the source actually says the value is different, at 1 x 10^15 * h^(-1) solar masses. What is h? I'm not sure, but Parsec#Megaparsecs_and_gigaparsecs gives one plausible interpretation. Combining that interpretation with the numeric values in Hubble constant, it seems h is around 0.67 or 0.72. If so, the mass of the Virgo Supercluster would be around 1.3-1.5 x 10^15 solar masses. Can someone with an astronomy background say if this is the proper interpretation of h? Mynameisnoted (talk) 07:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Name, again[edit]

There's an article from the Eurekalert site today that reports the designation of a new name for the local supercluster; "Laniakea". If true, then perhaps this article will have to be renamed again. Tmangray (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

No, that is a different structure. Laniakea is a combination of Virgo SCl and Hydra-Centaurus SCl, so it is not the same thing. Virgo SCl is a lobe in the new structure, so should remain where it is. The problem is what to do with the redirect Local Supercluster, since all research until now is about this Virgo SCl, and not the new structure "Laniakea". I've opened a discussion at WT:ASTRO. -- (talk) 12:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

"Local supercluster"?[edit]

Isn't that the Virgo Supercluster? That's still a thing, right? Serendipodous 08:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)