Talk:Vivid Superhero

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Comics: Films

	Comics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
	This redirect is supported by Comic book films work group.

Science Fiction

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles

Warning: Weasel words!

The use of weasel words in this article is somewhat troubling, and ultimately seems to make this page read like a put-down of any and all superhero porn parodies that are not produced by Vivid ("Hardcore Parody...seems to have an even smaller budget and scope than Extreme Comixxx" "production value and general quality are significantly in less quantity than that of Vivid Superhero."). -- jayunderscorezero (talk) 21:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of focus/Non-Vivid superhero porn parodies

It's dubious whether a long list of films produced by other companies (not to mention the "background" section that delves into the history of superhero porn parodies as a whole) even belongs on a page titled "Vivid Superhero." Perhaps if this page were renamed "Superhero Pornographic Parodies in Film" or something. -- jayunderscorezero (talk) 21:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing History

Part of what sets Vivid Superhero apart from other similar studios is the level of detail in the writing, designs, and cast (hence why I made the decision to make them a page over the others). If not a history section, what section could be made to make this distinction against the other studios cashing in on Vivid's success? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alucardbarnivous (talk • contribs) 21:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem really is that it seems impossible to write what you'd want to write without sounding incredibly subjective. Even phrases like "other studios cashing in on Vivid's success" are terribly loaded and come off as both fannish and unencyclopaedic when placed into an article.

If you want something listing and comparing different superhero porn parody films from different studios, then as I suggested, perhaps creating a separate page for that would be the best thing. Inserted here, it seems like essay-ish writing and original research is encroaching on an article that is ostensibly supposed to be about a single film studio. --jayunderscorezero (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Vivid Superhero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]