Talk:Voice of San Diego

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Journalism (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject San Diego (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Adding copyright violation tag per request. Copyvio removed, reverted by vandal, and removed again:

Thanks, removed copyvio from history. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 13:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Innuendo re: CSM profile[edit]

I just removed a segment of this story that suggests that, because the author of the CS Monitor piece started writing for VOSD three months later, that he had a conflict of interest when writing the story for the CSM. Seems pretty shaky to me; I've not heard of anyone accused of retroactive bias for writing about a subject and then later becoming involved with it. Isn't that a bit like Victor Kiam liking Remington Razors so much, he bought the company? (Disclosure: I have known Dotinga since college. I have no affiliation with the CSM or VOSD or any other San Diego media.) Personally, the lengthy CSM quote seems awfully self-serving, too. I'm not sure if it's relevant at all. Jsnell (talk) 23:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I've removed the lengthy media quotes as well as the insinuation of a retroactive conspiracy, and moved both the CSM and NYT references to a new media section. Jsnell (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)