Talk:WAPA-TV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WAPA-TV.and WAPA Radio[edit]

WAPA-TV and WAPA-Radio are not currently owned by the same company. Hemisphere Media Group owns WAPA-TV, and WAPA Radio is locally owned. 66.50.146.70 (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2003 (UTC)[reply]

WAPA Television and WAPA Radio are not currently owned by the same company. InterMedia Partners owns WAPA Television, and WAPA Radio is locally owned by Wilfredo G. Blanco Pi & his son Jorge Blanco. 142.255.225.199 (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to WAPA-TV[edit]

I'm for it. Kimmykun 05:27, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Result[edit]

Moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 22:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WapaGamma80.jpg[edit]

Image:WapaGamma80.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal acquirements to World's Most Amazing Videos from Spike TV (News)[edit]

Apparently, Wapa has somehow acquired the World's Most Amazing Videos without the use of Spike TV's permission. Their voice dubbings are bland and terrible and therefore they could get sued because of illegal acquisitions. Believe me, its true. 70.45.182.188 (talk) 20:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WNJX-TV merger[edit]

WNJX-TV is just a satellite station. There's no reason why it should have its own page. WORA-TV and WOLE-TV are different since they're TV station sin their own right, but WNJX isn't. Kimmykun (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WNJX-TV article is missing information about a possibly-important time between WLII and WAPA-TV: the article says "it is unknown what the station brocadcast until it became a satellite for WAPA-TV", which is of course unsourced, dubious, and unencyclopedic. Whether a station was responsible for originating programming or making its own local programming decisions is usually one of the main indicators of a station's notability on Wikipedia. Did this station ever make programming decisions of its own, or originate programming other than drop-ins for other stations' newscasts? If it did, the article should stay. If one can verify with reliable sources that this station has done nothing but rebroadcast other stations, with no history between, then perhaps it should be merged. --Closeapple (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]