This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I've noticed the structural image for this molecule has been removed and replaced. Just wondering the reasoning for this. The PNG image that has been placed on the site is structurally incorrect according to the BIOMOL reference. I'm now replacing this one with the higher resolution and structurally correct image on the page. If I'm just absolutely missing something here, please let me know. Ccroberts( t · c · g ) 18:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I've restoredthe image, because it is an interesting illustration to the actions of the agonist that are listed in the article (anti-inflammatory etc.) Besides it improves the connectivity, linking to the sparcely known subtype of cells. You can simplify the description to tailor it to the "simple" audience, but to me the caption seems simple: WIN "calms down" the fibroblast-like cells. Best regards, --CopperKettle 03:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
It is a beautiful image but I still think it is not too informative, even for people with a science background. I know it is kind of hard to find a common basis for what is the right kind of content for wikipedia. Panoramix303 (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
If you feel so bad against it, delete it. --CopperKettle 01:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
This is not solely my decision. Let's wait for some more input from other users. Panoramix303 (talk) 05:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)