Talk:Wadala

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wadala article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in June 2009.

Cleanup[edit]

I've added a reference section with 18 references, and removed promotional statements. Also spell checked and restructured, and added history section. Should the article still be marked for cleanup? Shravan.Iyer (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The cleanup tag is not necessary, but the quality of references can be questioned. For eg. [1] AND [2] does not seek to be "WP:reliable source. Also, the article says " Sant Tukaram who brought the idol from Pandharpur. The temple is known as Prati Pandharpur " No mention of Pandharpur or Prati Pandharpur in the reference. WP:original research suspected. No change in rating. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have added news articles as references for both the above mentioned points. No original research.Shravan.Iyer (talk) 07:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Wadala[edit]

I propose this article be moved to Wadala. Wadala is better known and denotes the whole area. Wadala Road only denotes the railway station. Any objections?--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to suggest the same thing, but wanted to wait till the other issues with the article are cleared first. It makes sense to move it to Wadala.Shravan.Iyer (talk) 07:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/287470084
Triggered by \bthepetitionsite\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wadala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]