Talk:Wallace Huo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Wallacehuojianhua.jpg[edit]

Image:Wallacehuojianhua.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is a CF?[edit]

I tried to wikify this page, but I am confused as to what a "CF" is, as it is mentioned a numner of times in this article. Angryapathy (talk) 18:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes by IP editor[edit]

  • spouse: That is the correct format and since they are married, the citation is removed.
  • commercial value: There is already a table on commercial. It is also a part of his career and so another section on it is not necessary.
  • personal life: The fact that they are married is more crucial than when they announced it.
  • filmography: Why removed those content? Those are not incorrect information.
  • subsection headings: Please read WP:BLP. It doesn't sound neutral and in fact like original research.

Please also try to leave an edit summary or express your point of view here before substantially rewriting the page. Why not try editing section by section and let others know the reason of your changes? Jessicat830 (talk) 00:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • filmography - do not need to put occupation of the character. if you insist, you can put under notes.
  • commercial value - placed under commercials as elaborated content, separated from acting career.
  • subsection headings - acting projects yet to be released placed under separate category. when they are released, you can place them back under the respective years. i have already removed the "unnetural" subsection headings.
  • career - similar content are grouped together and better summarized to ensure easier reading. none of your written content has been removed.

Please do not remove other users' edit when they are not harmful and/or trying to clean up the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:E800:E60F:409:F167:6505:A452:CBA1 (talk) 01:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for exchanging your point of view. Actually, most of the contents you removed are not done by me. I helped in finding sources mostly. As you said, please respect other users' edits. An edit summary would be most helpful, such as explaining your changes or referring users to the talk page. This page just happens to be on my watchlist. You might take a look on Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Jessicat830 (talk) 02:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The section heading is "career" not "acting career". I really don't understand why there is a need to elaborate under "commercial". Also, acting projects yet to be released were separated on another subheading. It looks strange. Is this about the subject's career or his works'? I'll change back some, leaving the last one in that section. Please exchange your views. Jessicat830 (talk) 08:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I never knew he was Taiwanese[edit]

He's in all these popular Chinese dramas, so I always thought he was Chinese. TorynPrix (talk) 18:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]