Talk:Wallarah 2 Coal Project

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wallarah 2 Coal Project is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article update

I have added some updated information to this article to reflect the fact that the mine is again being considered. Probably needs more detail, inclding references. Nomenklatura44 (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title too broad

The event described probably merits an article, but the present one is decidedly slanted against this mineral exploitation activity. The title itself implies a certian point of veiw and should be changed to something more descriptive. Deranged bulbasaur 05:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The title of this article should be a bit more descriptive. After all, there are many debates about coal mining around the world.Plazak 17:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved "Coal mining debate" to "Wallarah 2 Coal Project".Plazak 13:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV problems

The whole article is shot through with POV problems. There is almost no description of the project - only of its controversy. There are many unsourced statements. Although the quote in the "Opposition" section links to an opposition web page, that web page does not contain the quote. Also, I don't know exactly how things are done in NSW, but the discussed "loyalty" payment appear to be what I am used to calling a "royalty" payment.Plazak 13:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]