Jump to content

Talk:Walter Ray Williams Jr.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Worlds Number 1 Bowler?

[edit]

An anonymous user edited this article to say that Williams is the worlds number 1 bowler. I reverted this back as it is disputed with no real evidence - considering he performs in the PBA and not the Weber, Master or AMF. Now, a user has put it back - can this be discussed? Thanks, User:Fjorn

Two comments 1. Earl Anthony won 43 PBA titles, not 41, so the record was passed later than stated here. http://www.pba.com/players/hof/playerbio.asp?ID=34 2. Williams is "arguably" the world's best career bowler, based on the records he holds. But as with any sport, who is no. 1 is always open to debate. Remember that on any given Sunday the best can be beaten. I will change the article to reflect this. Possibly spurring further ranchor. Kanaugle (talk) 14:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Walter Ray Williams Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]