Talk:WannaCry ransomware attack
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WannaCry ransomware attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
A news item involving WannaCry ransomware attack was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 May 2017. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about WannaCry ransomware attack. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about WannaCry ransomware attack at the Reference desk. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Reference 69 is a malicious website
[edit]ttps://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.antiy.net%2Fp%2Fin-depth-analysis-report-on-wannacry-ransomware%2F
83.249.122.50 (talk) 11:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
[edit]The list of hacked organisations lists the Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. However, citation 141, which is used for the Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, cites a cybernetic attack that was sent as a fake message from NATO. While the date of the cited article corresponds with the WannaCry attack, the article does not mention WannaCry and does not mention ransomware at all. Furthermore, a Google search does not show any evidence of the virus being WannaCry.
Scarletwill (talk) 09:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Possible change to a sentence in paragraph one
[edit]I'd like to change sentence 5 of paragraph 1. "These patches were imperative to an organization's cyber-security but many were not applied because of neglect, ignorance, mismanagement, or a misunderstanding about their importance." The information is good but it is phrased a little oddly. I think a shorter sentence might be more clear. For example we could do something like: "These patches were imperative to organizations' cyber security but many were not implemented due to general ignorance of their importance."
If anyone has other suggestions or thinks the current phrasing is good, please reply! Thanks, Its choosday innit (talk) 22:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- B-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- B-Class Computing articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- B-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- B-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- B-Class Computer Security articles
- High-importance Computer Security articles
- B-Class Computer Security articles of High-importance
- All Computer Security articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- B-Class Internet articles
- Mid-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Wikipedia In the news articles