Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 542

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWashington State Route 542 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 24, 2013Good article nomineeListed

created Abby redirect

[edit]

Because of the way the template operates, had to create Abbotsord B.C., Washington as a redirect LOL.....what happens on other WSRs, e.g. for Osoyoos, Grand Forks et al?Skookum1 (talk) 05:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't necessary. Replace "city" with "location" in {{jct}} and use wiki links inside there. The other articles haven't been updated yet. SounderBruce 06:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 542/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 15:54, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The sentence "SR 542 continues northeast through rural Whatcom County and crosses the Nooksack River to a roundabout with SR 9, becoming concurrent in the process." needs to be reworded.
      •  Fixed
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for one minor rewording to be done. Dough4872 22:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 08:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Washington State Route 542. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]