Talk:WebFOCUS

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edited to conform to NPOV (facts rather than assertions).

This reads suspiciously like ad copy. Additionally, all of the external links point to the product vendor. It would help if the article had "third party" citations and comparisons to competing products. William (Bill) Bean 13:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing the advertising out caused incorrect statements

I accept that the Wikipedia editors wanted to reduce the non-NPOV content for this entry, but the edits of April 2008 eliminated any relevant content and, worse, claimed something that was false -- specifically, that WebFOCUS is a language.

I am completely updating this page, noting company claims and industry information with citations. I welcome opportunities to adjust my language to a more neutral POV, but these are the things that make the company what it is, so I would appreciate it if people would contact me (jake_freivald at informationbuilders.com) and have a discussion rather than simply hacking out the meat of the entry.

Thanks! Jdfreivald (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]