Talk:Wenzi
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
[edit]The Wen-tzu article duplicates this one. Shouldn't they be merged? Keahapana (talk) 23:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- In fact the Wen-tzu article can safely be scrapped entirely, with the one suggestion that the "Content" section on the Wenzi page mostly contains discussion of the dating and authenticity issue, and could stand to be altered to contain a fuller description of the actual content, without regard to authenticity. STF —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.213.248.248 (talk) 11:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Sam Weller (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Agree as well. How do we do it? ~
- Agreed. Sam Weller (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- C-Class Eastern philosophy articles
- Low-importance Eastern philosophy articles
- Eastern philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Ancient philosophy articles
- Low-importance Ancient philosophy articles
- Ancient philosophy task force articles