Talk:West Pier Public Convenience
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the West Pier Public Convenience article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from West Pier Public Convenience appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a urinal at Rothesay's Victorian Toilets (pictured) commemorates Prince Charles' personal patronage? Source: Marian Pallister (2018), "An Elegant Relief", Argyll Curiosities, Birlinn, ISBN 9781788850988,
A urinal graced by HRH Prince Charles, Duke of Rothesay, is honoured by a plaque bearing his coat of arms...
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chinese dama
- Comment: I have more sources lined up to expand the article from but am getting the nomination done while it's fresh.
Created by Andrew Davidson (talk). Self-nominated at 23:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC).
- Article is new enough and long enough, so those other sources for expansion are indeed unnecessary for our standpoint here though they would be of benefit. Inline citations are throughout and it's written neutrally. I suppose an article about a urinal commemorated for Prince Charles is interesting enough without taking the piss, so to speak. It's an offline source though so AGF. Image appears well at this size and gives me a little anx about how it would look if they were all occupied. I believe the bold link term will need to be piped so as to not be a redirect. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P6 without image