Talk:Where the Truth Lies

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

NC17

Is the first thing you want to convey about the film the fact that it didn't get a 17+ rating in the US, surely this should be much further down the article! Why not write about the fact that it got an 18 certificate in the UK in that case?

The order makes no sense, so I've changed it. Gomez2002 (talk) 13:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Story lining

To me the solution of the whodunit, like it's told, is just a may be and not nescessarly the truth. The whole mixture of genres and Karen as an investingator are unconvincable either. To many possiblities throw the story out of focus.The possible lines fade out and the servants motive for murder isn't any.Rich colour and nudes aren't enough to do a good movie!--Danaide (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT WP:FORUM WP:SPAM. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 01:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Where the Truth Lies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090115223832/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/reviews/movie/7567564/review/8088401/where_the_truth_lies to http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/7567564/review/8088401/where_the_truth_lies

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]