Talk:Whitefield, New Hampshire

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: New Hampshire Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).

Waumbeck not in Whitefield

Thanks for the fine additions, Hugh_Manatee, but the Waumbeck Hotel and cottages were (and cottages still are) in Jefferson, not Whitefield. The postcard image appears to be looking northwest along the Meadows Road (Rt 115A) toward Mt Starr King. What we now call U.S. Highway 2 runs past the front of the cottages. Lupinelawyer 21:54, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Whitefield CDP article with this article. --Ken Gallager (talk) 20:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Sandy Fensenthal copyright 1982.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Sandy Fensenthal copyright 1982.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Too many images?

All of the early-1900s postcard images in the Geography section seem unnecessary. They don't seem to add anything to the article and take up quite a bit of space. I've scoured the relevant style guides for images and I can't find any specific rules about this so I'm curious about what the community thinks. Thanks! Pugchump (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GALLERY says fairly clearly that image galleries such as the one in this article should not just be a repository of available images for an article's subject. I have seen people remove galleries for such a reason. Personally, I don't see it in this case as being obtrusive in the article, but I will defer to other editors' opinions. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the last two images because they don't seem to be related to their respective sections at all. They appear to be filler that doesn't contribute much to the article. I feel that the gallery is also not exactly necessary for the article but I'll also defer to other editors' opinions on that matter. Pugchump (talk) 22:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]