Talk:William Shakespeare/New reference style
For reference: state when article was copied here
William Shakespeare (baptised 26 April 1564 – 23 April 1616)[a] was an English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's preeminent dramatist.[1] He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon" (or simply "The Bard"). His surviving works consist of 38 plays,[b] 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and several other poems. His plays have been translated into every major living language, and are performed more often than those of any other playwright.[2]
Shakespeare was born and raised in Stratford-upon-Avon. At the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway, who bore him three children: Susanna, and twins Hamnet and Judith. Between 1585 and 1592, he began a successful career in London as an actor, writer, and part owner of a playing company called the Lord Chamberlain's Men, later known as the King's Men. He appears to have retired to Stratford around 1613, where he died three years later. Few records of Shakespeare's private life survive, and there has been considerable speculation about such matters as his sexuality, religious beliefs, and whether the works attributed to him were written by others.[3]
Shakespeare produced most of his known work between 1590 and 1613. His early plays were mainly comedies and histories, genres he raised to the peak of sophistication and artistry by the end of the sixteenth century. He then wrote mainly tragedies until about 1608, including Hamlet, King Lear, and Macbeth, considered some of the finest examples in the English language. In his last phase, he wrote tragicomedies, also known as romances, and collaborated with other playwrights. Many of his plays were published in editions of varying quality and accuracy during his lifetime. In 1623, two of his former theatrical colleagues published the First Folio, a collected edition of his dramatic works that included all but two of the plays now recognised as Shakespeare's.
Shakespeare was a respected poet and playwright in his own day, but his reputation did not rise to its present heights until the nineteenth century. The Romantics, in particular, acclaimed Shakespeare's genius, and the Victorians hero-worshipped Shakespeare with a reverence that George Bernard Shaw called "bardolatry".[4] In the twentieth century, his work was repeatedly adopted and rediscovered by new movements in scholarship and performance. His plays remain highly popular today and are constantly performed and reinterpreted in diverse cultural and political contexts throughout the world.
Life
[edit]Early life
[edit]William Shakespeare was the son of John Shakespeare, a successful glover and alderman originally from Snitterfield, and Mary Arden, the daughter of an affluent landowning farmer.[5] He was born in Stratford-upon-Avon and baptised on 26 April 1564. His unknown birthday is traditionally observed on 23 April, St George's Day.[6] This date, which can be traced back to an eighteenth-century scholar's mistake, has proved appealing because Shakespeare died on 23 April 1616.[7] He was the third child of eight and the eldest surviving son.[8]
Although no attendance records for the period survive, most biographers agree that Shakespeare was educated at the King's New School in Stratford,[9] a free school chartered in 1553,[10] about a quarter of a mile from his home. Grammar schools varied in quality during the Elizabethan era, but the curriculum was dictated by law throughout England,[11] and the school would have provided an intensive education in Latin grammar and the classics.[12] At the age of 18, Shakespeare married the 26-year-old Anne Hathaway. The consistory court of the Diocese of Worcester issued a marriage licence on 27 November 1582. Two of Hathaway's neighbours posted bonds the next day as surety that there were no impediments to the marriage.[13] The couple may have arranged the ceremony in some haste, since the Worcester chancellor allowed the marriage banns to be read once instead of the usual three times.[14] Anne's pregnancy could have been the reason for this. Six months after the marriage, she gave birth to a daughter, Susanna, who was baptised on 26 May 1583.[15] Twins, son Hamnet and daughter Judith, followed almost two years later and were baptised on 2 February 1585.[16] Hamnet died of unknown causes at the age of 11 and was buried on 11 August 1596.[17]
After the birth of the twins, there are few historical traces of Shakespeare until he is mentioned as part of the London theatre scene in 1592. Because of this gap, scholars refer to the years between 1585 and 1592 as Shakespeare's "lost years".[18] Biographers attempting to account for this period have reported many apocryphal stories. Nicholas Rowe, Shakespeare’s first biographer, recounted a Stratford legend that Shakespeare fled the town for London to escape prosecution for deer poaching.[19] Another eighteenth-century story has Shakespeare starting his theatrical career minding the horses of theatre patrons in London.[20] John Aubrey reported that Shakespeare had been a country schoolmaster.[21] Some twentieth-century scholars have suggested that Shakespeare may have been employed as a schoolmaster by Alexander Hoghton of Lancashire, a Catholic landowner who named a certain "William Shakeshafte" in his will.[22] No evidence substantiates such stories other than hearsay collected after his death.[23]
London and theatrical career
[edit]It is not known exactly when Shakespeare began writing, but contemporary allusions and records of performances show that several of his plays were on the London stage by 1592.[24] He was well enough known in London by then to be attacked in print by the playwright Robert Greene:
...there is an upstart Crow, beautified with our feathers, that with his Tiger's heart wrapped in a Player's hide, supposes he is as well able to bombast out a blank verse as the best of you: and being an absolute Johannes factotum, is in his own conceit the only Shake-scene in a country.[25]
Scholars differ on the exact meaning of these words,[26] but most agree that Greene is accusing Shakespeare of reaching above his rank in trying to match university-educated writers, such as Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Nashe and Greene himself.[27] The italicised phrase parodying the line "Oh, tiger's heart wrapped in a woman's hide" from Shakespeare’s Henry VI, part 3, along with the pun "Shake-scene", identifies Shakespeare as Greene’s target.[28]
"All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players: they have their exits and their entrances; and one man in his time plays many parts..." |
As You Like It, Act II, Scene 7, 139–42.[29] |
Greene’s attack is the first recorded mention of Shakespeare’s career in the theatre. Biographers suggest that his career may have begun any time from the mid-1580s to just before Greene’s remarks.[30] From 1594, Shakespeare's plays were performed only by the Lord Chamberlain's Men, a company owned by a group of players, including Shakespeare, that soon became the leading playing company in London.[31] After the death of Queen Elizabeth in 1603, the company was awarded a royal patent by the new king, James I, and changed its name to the King's Men.[32]
In 1599, a partnership of company members built their own theatre on the south bank of the Thames, which they called the Globe. In 1608, the partnership also took over the Blackfriars indoor theatre. Records of Shakespeare's property purchases and investments indicate that the company made him a wealthy man.[33] In 1597, he bought the second-largest house in Stratford, New Place, and in 1605, he invested in a share of the parish tithes in Stratford.[34]
Some of Shakespeare's plays were published in quarto editions from 1594. By 1598, his name had become a selling point and began to appear on the title pages.[35] Shakespeare continued to act in his own and other plays after his success as a playwright. The 1616 edition of Ben Jonson's Works names him on the cast lists for Every Man in His Humour (1598) and Sejanus, His Fall (1603).[36] The absence of his name from the 1605 cast list for Jonson’s Volpone is taken by some scholars as a sign that his acting career was nearing its end.[37] The First Folio of 1623, however, lists Shakespeare as one of "the Principal Actors in all these Plays", some of which were first staged after Volpone, although we cannot know for certain what roles he played.[38] In 1610, John Davies of Hereford wrote that "good Will" played "kingly" roles.[39] In 1709, Rowe passed down a tradition that Shakespeare played the ghost of Hamlet's father.[40] Later traditions maintain that he also played Adam in As You Like It and the Chorus in Henry V,[41] though scholars doubt the sources of the information.[42]
Shakespeare divided his time between London and Stratford during his career. In 1596, the year before he bought New Place as his family home in Stratford, Shakespeare was living in the parish of St. Helen's, Bishopsgate, north of the River Thames.[43] He moved across the river to Southwark by 1599, the year his company constructed the Globe Theatre there.[44] By 1604, he had moved north of the river again, to an area north of St Paul's Cathedral with many fine houses. There he rented rooms from a French Huguenot called Christopher Mountjoy, a maker of ladies' wigs and other headgear.[45]
Later years and death
[edit]After 1606–1607, Shakespeare wrote fewer plays, and none are attributed to him after 1613.[46] His last three plays were collaborations, probably with John Fletcher,[47] who succeeded him as the house playwright for the King’s Men.[48]
Rowe was the first biographer to pass down the tradition that Shakespeare retired to Stratford some years before his death;[49] but retirement from all work was uncommon at that time,[50] and Shakespeare continued to visit London.[51] In 1612, he was called as a witness in a court case concerning the marriage settlement of Mountjoy's daughter, Mary.[52] In March 1613, he bought a gatehouse in the Blackfriars priory;[53] and from November 1614, he was in London for several weeks with his son-in-law, John Hall.[54]
Shakespeare died on 23 April 1616,[55] and was survived by his wife and two daughters. Susanna had married a physician, John Hall, in 1607,[56] and Judith had married Thomas Quiney, a vintner, two months before Shakespeare’s death.[57]
In his will, Shakespeare left the bulk of his large estate to his elder daughter Susanna.[58] The terms instructed that she pass it down intact to "the first son of her body".[59] The Quineys had three children, all of whom died without marrying.[60] The Halls had one child, Elizabeth, who married twice but died without children in 1670, ending Shakespeare’s direct line.[61] Shakespeare's will scarcely mentions his wife, Anne, who was probably entitled to one third of his estate automatically. He did make a point, however, of leaving her "my second best bed", a bequest that has led to much speculation.[62] Some scholars see the bequest as an insult to Anne, whereas others believe that the second-best bed would have been the matrimonial bed and therefore rich in significance.[63]
Shakespeare was buried in the chancel of the Holy Trinity Church two days after his death.[64] Sometime before 1623, a monument was erected in his memory on the north wall, with a half-effigy of him in the act of writing. Its plaque compares him to Nestor, Socrates, and Virgil.[65] A stone slab covering his grave is inscribed with a curse against moving his bones. Shakespeare has been commemorated in a number of statues and memorials around the world.
Plays
[edit]Scholars have often noted four periods in Shakespeare's writing career.[66] Until the mid-1590s, he wrote mainly comedies influenced by Roman and Italian models and history plays in the popular chronicle tradition. His second period began in about 1595 with the tragedy Romeo and Juliet and ended with the tragedy of Julius Caesar in 1599. During this time, he wrote what are considered his greatest comedies and histories. From about 1600 to about 1608, his "tragic period", Shakespeare wrote mostly tragedies, and from about 1608 to 1613, mainly tragicomedies, also called romances.
The first recorded works of Shakespeare are Richard III and the three parts of Henry VI, written in the early 1590s during a vogue for historical drama. Shakespeare's plays are difficult to date, however,[67] and studies of the texts suggest that Titus Andronicus, The Comedy of Errors, The Taming of the Shrew and Two Gentlemen of Verona may also belong to Shakespeare’s earliest period.[68] His first histories, which draw heavily on the 1587 edition of Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland,[69] dramatise the destructive results of weak or corrupt rule and have been interpreted as a justification for the origins of the Tudor dynasty.[70] Their composition was influenced by the works of other Elizabethan dramatists, especially Thomas Kyd and Christopher Marlowe[c], by the traditions of medieval drama, and by the plays of Seneca.[71] The Comedy of Errors was also based on classical models, but no source for the The Taming of the Shrew has been found, though it is related to a separate play of the same name and may have derived from a folk story.[72] Like Two Gentlemen of Verona, in which two friends appear to approve of rape,[73] the Shrew's story of the taming of a woman's independent spirit by a man sometimes troubles modern critics and directors.[74]
Shakespeare's early classical and Italianate comedies, containing tight double plots and precise comic sequences, give way in the mid-1590s to the romantic atmosphere of his greatest comedies.[75] A Midsummer Night's Dream is a witty mixture of romance, fairy magic, and comic lowlife scenes.[76] Shakespeare's next comedy, the equally romantic The Merchant of Venice, contains a portrayal of the vengeful Jewish moneylender Shylock which reflected Elizabethan views but may appear prejudiced to modern audiences.[77] The wit and wordplay of Much Ado About Nothing,[78] the charming rural setting of As You Like It, and the lively merrymaking of Twelfth Night complete Shakespeare's sequence of great comedies.[79] After the lyrical Richard II, written almost entirely in verse, Shakespeare introduced prose comedy into the histories of the late 1590s, Henry IV, parts 1 and 2, and Henry V. His characters become more complex and tender as he switches deftly between comic and serious scenes, prose and poetry, and achieves the narrative variety of his mature work.[80] This period begins and ends with two tragedies: Romeo and Juliet, the famous romantic tragedy of sexually charged adolescence, love, and death;[81] and Julius Caesar—based on Sir Thomas North's 1579 translation of Plutarch's Parallel Lives—which introduced a new kind of drama.[82] According to Shakespearean scholar James Shapiro, in Julius Caesar "the various strands of politics, character, inwardness, contemporary events, even Shakespeare's own reflections on the act of writing, began to infuse each other".[83]
Shakespeare's so-called "tragic period" lasted from about 1600 to 1608, though he also wrote the so-called "problem plays" Measure for Measure, Troilus and Cressida, and All's Well That Ends Well during this time and had written tragedies before.[84] Many critics believe that Shakespeare's greatest tragedies represent the peak of his art. The hero of the first, Hamlet, has probably been more discussed than any other Shakespearean character, especially for his famous soliloquy "To be or not to be; that is the question."[85] Unlike the introverted Hamlet, whose fatal flaw is hesitation, the heroes of the tragedies that followed, Othello and King Lear, are undone by hasty errors of judgement.[86] The plots of Shakespeare's tragedies often hinge on such fatal errors or flaws, which overturn order and destroy the hero and those he loves.[87] In Othello, the villain Iago stokes Othello's sexual jealousy to the point where he murders the innocent wife who loves him.[88] In King Lear, the old king commits the tragic error of giving up his powers, initiating the events which lead to the murder of his daughter and the torture and blinding of the Earl of Gloucester. According to the critic Frank Kermode, "the play offers neither its good characters nor its audience any relief from its cruelty".[89] In Macbeth, the shortest and most compressed of Shakespeare's tragedies,[90] uncontrollable ambition incites Macbeth and his wife, Lady Macbeth, to murder the rightful king and usurp the throne, until their own guilt destroys them in turn.[91] In this play, Shakespeare adds a supernatural element to the tragic structure. His last major tragedies, Antony and Cleopatra and Coriolanus, contain some of Shakespeare's finest poetry and were considered his most successful tragedies by the poet and critic T. S. Eliot.[92]
In his final period, Shakespeare turned to romance or tragicomedy and completed three more major plays: Cymbeline, The Winter's Tale and The Tempest, as well as the collaboration, Pericles, Prince of Tyre. Less bleak than the tragedies, these four plays are graver in tone than the comedies of the 1590s, but they end with reconciliation and the forgiveness of potentially tragic errors.[93] Some commentators have seen this change in mood as evidence of a more serene view of life on Shakespeare's part, but it may merely reflect the theatrical fashion of the day.[94] Shakespeare collaborated on two further surviving plays, Henry VIII and The Two Noble Kinsmen, probably with John Fletcher.[95]
Performances
[edit]It is not clear for which companies Shakespeare wrote his early plays. The title page of the 1594 edition of Titus Andronicus reveals that the play had been acted by three different troupes.[96] After the plagues of 1592–3, Shakespeare's plays were performed by his own company at The Theatre and the Curtain in Shoreditch, north of the Thames.[97] Londoners flocked there to see the first part of Henry IV, Leonard Digges recording, "Let but Falstaff come, Hal, Poins, the rest...and you scarce shall have a room".[98] When the company found themselves in dispute with their landlord, they pulled The Theatre down and used the timbers to construct the Globe Theatre, the first playhouse built by actors for actors, on the south bank of the Thames at Southwark.[99] The Globe opened in autumn 1599, with Julius Caesar one of the first plays staged. Most of Shakespeare's greatest post-1599 plays were written for the Globe, including Hamlet, Othello and King Lear.[100]
After the Lord Chamberlain's Men were renamed the King's Men in 1603, they entered a special relationship with the new King James. Although the performance records are patchy, the King's Men performed seven of Shakespeare's plays at court between 1 November 1604 and 31 October 1605, including two performances of The Merchant of Venice.[101] After 1608, they performed at the indoor Blackfriars Theatre during the winter and the Globe during the summer.[102] The indoor setting, combined with the Jacobean fashion for lavishly staged masques, allowed Shakespeare to introduce more elaborate stage devices. In Cymbeline, for example, Jupiter descends "in thunder and lightning, sitting upon an eagle: he throws a thunderbolt. The ghosts fall on their knees."[103]
The actors in Shakespeare's company included the famous Richard Burbage, William Kempe, Henry Condell and John Heminges. Burbage played the leading role in the first performances of many of Shakespeare's plays, including Richard III, Hamlet, Othello, and King Lear.[104] The popular comic actor Will Kempe played the servant Peter in Romeo and Juliet and Dogberry in Much Ado About Nothing, among other characters.[105] He was replaced around the turn of the sixteenth century by Robert Armin, who played roles such as Touchstone in As You Like It and the fool in King Lear.[106] In 1613, Sir Henry Wotton recorded that Henry VIII "was set forth with many extraordinary circumstances of pomp and ceremony".[107] On 29 June, however, a cannon set fire to the thatch of the Globe and burned the theatre to the ground, an event which pinpoints the date of a Shakespeare play with rare precision.[107]
Textual sources
[edit]In 1623, John Heminges and Henry Condell, two of Shakespeare's friends from the King's Men, published the First Folio, a collected edition of Shakespeare's plays. It contained 36 texts, including 18 printed for the first time.[108] Many of the plays had already appeared in quarto versions—flimsy books made from sheets of paper folded twice to make four leaves.[109] No evidence suggests that Shakespeare approved these editions, which the First Folio describes as "stol'n and surreptitious copies".[110] Alfred Pollard termed some of them "bad quartos" because of their adapted, paraphrased or garbled texts, which may in places have been reconstructed from memory.[111] Where several versions of a play survive, each differs from the other. The differences may stem from copying or printing errors, from notes by actors or audience members, or from Shakespeare's own papers.[112] In some cases, for example Hamlet, Troilus and Cressida and Othello, Shakespeare could have revised texts between the quarto and folio editions. The folio version of King Lear is so different from the 1608 quarto that the Oxford Shakespeare prints them both, since they cannot be conflated without confusion.[113]
Poems
[edit]In 1593 and 1594, when the theatres were closed because of plague, Shakespeare published two narrative poems on erotic themes, Venus and Adonis and The Rape of Lucrece. He dedicated them to Henry Wriothesley, earl of Southampton. In Venus and Adonis, an innocent Adonis rejects the sexual advances of Venus; while in The Rape of Lucrece, the virtuous wife Lucrece is raped by the lustful Tarquin.[114] Influenced by Ovid's Metamorphoses,[115] the poems show the guilt and moral confusion that result from uncontrolled lust.[116] Both proved popular and were often reprinted during Shakespeare's lifetime. A third narrative poem, A Lover's Complaint, in which a young woman laments her seduction by a persuasive suitor, was printed in the first edition of the Sonnets in 1609. Most scholars now accept that Shakespeare wrote A Lover's Complaint. Critics consider that its fine qualities are marred by leaden effects.[117] The Phoenix and the Turtle, printed in Robert Chester's 1601 Love's Martyr, mourns the deaths of the legendary phoenix and his lover, the faithful turtle dove. In 1599, two early drafts of sonnets 138 and 144 appeared in The Passionate Pilgrim, published under Shakespeare's name but without his permission.[118]
Sonnets
[edit]
"Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? Thou art more lovely and more temperate..." |
Lines from Shakespeare's Sonnet 18.[119] |
Published in 1609, the Sonnets were the last of Shakespeare's non-dramatic works to be printed. Scholars are not certain when each of the 154 sonnets was composed, but evidence suggests that Shakespeare wrote sonnets throughout his career for a private readership.[120] Even before the two unauthorised sonnets appeared in The Passionate Pilgrim in 1599, Francis Meres had referred in 1598 to Shakespeare's "sugred Sonnets among his private friends".[121] Few analysts believe that the published collection follows Shakespeare's intended sequence.[122] He seems to have planned two contrasting series: one about uncontrollable lust for a married woman of dark complexion (the "dark lady"), and one about conflicted love for a fair young man (the "fair youth"). It remains unclear if these figures represent real individuals, or if the authorial "I" who addresses them represents Shakespeare himself, though Wordsworth believed that with the sonnets "Shakespeare unlocked his heart".[123] The 1609 edition was dedicated to a "Mr. W.H.", credited as "the only begetter" of the poems. It is not known whether this was written by Shakespeare himself or by the publisher, Thomas Thorpe, whose initials appear at the foot of the dedication page; nor is it known who Mr. W.H. was, despite numerous theories, or whether Shakespeare even authorised the publication.[124] Critics praise the Sonnets as a profound meditation on the nature of love, sexual passion, procreation, death, and time.[125]
Style
[edit]Shakespeare's first plays were written in the conventional style of the day. He wrote them in a stylised language that does not always spring naturally from the needs of the characters or the drama.[126] The poetry depends on extended, sometimes elaborate metaphors and conceits, and the language is often rhetorical—written for actors to declaim rather than speak. The grand speeches in Titus Andronicus, in the view of some critics, often hold up the action, for example; and the verse in Two Gentlemen of Verona has been described as stilted.[127]
Soon, however, Shakespeare began to adapt the traditional styles to his own purposes. The opening soliloquy of Richard III has its roots in the self-declaration of Vice in medieval drama. At the same time, Richard’s vivid self-awareness looks forward to the soliloquies of Shakespeare's mature plays.[128] No single play marks a change from the traditional to the freer style. Shakespeare combined the two throughout his career, with Romeo and Juliet perhaps the best example of the mixing of the styles.[129] By the time of Romeo and Juliet, Richard II, and A Midsummer Night's Dream in the mid-1590s, Shakespeare had begun to write a more natural poetry. He increasingly tuned his metaphors and images to the needs of the drama itself.
Shakespeare's standard poetic form was blank verse, composed in iambic pentameter. In practice, this meant that his verse was usually unrhymed and consisted of ten syllables to a line, spoken with a stress on every second syllable. The blank verse of his early plays is quite different from that of his later ones. It is often beautiful, but its sentences tend to start, pause, and finish at the end of lines, with the risk of monotony.[130] Once Shakespeare mastered traditional blank verse, he began to interrupt and vary its flow. This technique releases the new power and flexibility of the poetry in plays such as Julius Caesar and Hamlet. Shakespeare uses it, for example, to convey the turmoil in Hamlet's mind:[131]
- Sir, in my heart there was a kind of fighting
- That would not let me sleep. Methought I lay
- Worse than the mutines in the bilboes. Rashly—
- And prais'd be rashness for it—let us know
- Our indiscretion sometimes serves us well...
- Hamlet, Act 5, Scene 2, 4–8[131]
After Hamlet, Shakespeare varied his poetic style further, particularly in the more emotional passages of the late tragedies. The literary critic A. C. Bradley described this style as "more concentrated, rapid, varied, and, in construction, less regular, not seldom twisted or elliptical".[132] In the last phase of his career, Shakespeare adopted many techniques to achieve these effects. These included run-on lines, irregular pauses and stops, and extreme variations in sentence structure and length.[133] In Macbeth, for example, the language darts from one unrelated metaphor or simile to another: "was the hope drunk/ Wherein you dressed yourself?" (1.7.35–38); "...pity, like a naked new-born babe/ Striding the blast, or heaven's cherubim, hors'd/ Upon the sightless couriers of the air..." (1.7.21–25). The listener is challenged to complete the sense.[133] The late romances, with their shifts in time and surprising turns of plot, inspired a last poetic style in which long and short sentences are set against one another, clauses are piled up, subject and object are reversed, and words are omitted, creating an effect of spontaneity.[134]
Shakespeare's poetic genius was allied with a practical sense of the theatre.[135] Like all playwrights of the time, Shakespeare dramatised stories from sources such as Petrarch and Holinshed.[136] He reshaped each plot to create several centres of interest and show as many sides of a narrative to the audience as possible. This strength of design ensures that a Shakespeare play can survive translation, cutting and wide interpretation without loss to its core drama.[137] As Shakespeare’s mastery grew, he gave his characters clearer and more varied motivations and distinctive patterns of speech. He preserved aspects of his earlier style in the later plays, however. In his late romances, he deliberately returned to a more artificial style, which emphasised the illusion of theatre.[138]
Influence
[edit]Shakespeare's work has made a lasting impression on later theatre and literature. In particular, he expanded the dramatic potential of characterisation, plot, language, and genre.[139] Until Romeo and Juliet, for example, romance had not been viewed as a worthy topic for tragedy.[140] Soliloquies had been used mainly to convey information about characters or events; but Shakespeare used them to explore characters' minds.[141] His work heavily influenced later poetry. The Romantic poets attempted to revive Shakespearean verse drama, though with little success. Critic George Steiner described all English verse dramas from Coleridge to Tennyson as "feeble variations on Shakespearean themes."[142]
Shakespeare influenced novelists such as Thomas Hardy,[143] William Faulkner,[144] and Charles Dickens. Dickens often quoted Shakespeare, drawing 25 of his titles from Shakespeare's works.[145] The American novelist Herman Melville's soliloquies owe much to Shakespeare; his Captain Ahab in Moby-Dick is a classic tragic hero, inspired by King Lear.[146] Scholars have identified 20,000 pieces of music linked to Shakespeare's works. These include two operas by Giuseppe Verdi, Otello and Falstaff, whose critical standing compares with that of the source plays.[147] Shakespeare has also inspired many painters, including the Romantics and the Pre-Raphaelites.[148] The Swiss Romantic artist Henry Fuseli, a friend of William Blake, even translated Macbeth into German.[149] The psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud drew on Shakespearean psychology, in particular that of Hamlet, for his theories of human nature.[150]
In Shakespeare's day, English grammar and spelling were less standardised than they are now, and his use of language helped shape modern English.[151] Samuel Johnson quoted him more often than any other author in his A Dictionary of the English Language, the first serious work of its type.[152] Expressions such as "with bated breath" (Merchant of Venice) and "a foregone conclusion" (Othello) have found their way into everyday English speech.[153]
Critical reputation
[edit]
"He was not of an age, but for all time." |
Ben Jonson[154] |
Shakespeare was never revered in his lifetime, but he received his share of praise.[155] In 1598, the cleric and author Francis Meres singled him out from a group of English writers as "the most excellent" in both comedy and tragedy.[156] And the authors of the Parnassus plays at St John's College, Cambridge, numbered him with Chaucer, Gower and Spenser.[157] In the First Folio, Ben Jonson called Shakespeare the "Soul of the age, the applause, delight, the wonder of our stage", though he had remarked elsewhere that "Shakespeare wanted art".[158]
Between the Restoration of the monarchy in 1660 and the end of the seventeenth century, classical ideas were in vogue. As a result, critics of the time mostly rated Shakespeare below John Fletcher and Ben Jonson.[159] Thomas Rymer, for example, condemned Shakespeare for mixing the comic with the tragic. Nevertheless, poet and critic John Dryden rated Shakespeare highly, saying of Jonson, "I admire him, but I love Shakespeare".[160] For several decades, Rymer's view held sway; but during the eighteenth century, critics began to respond to Shakespeare on his own terms and acclaim what they termed his natural genius. A series of scholarly editions of his work, notably those of Samuel Johnson in 1765 and Edmond Malone in 1790, added to his growing reputation.[161] By 1800, he was firmly enshrined as the national poet.[162] In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, his reputation also spread abroad. Among those who championed him were the writers Voltaire, Goethe, Stendhal and Victor Hugo.[163]
During the Romantic era, Shakespeare was praised by the poet and literary philosopher Samuel Taylor Coleridge; and the critic August Wilhelm Schlegel translated his plays in the spirit of German Romanticism.[164] In the nineteenth century, critical admiration for Shakespeare's genius often bordered on adulation.[165] "That King Shakespeare," the essayist Thomas Carlyle wrote in 1840, "does not he shine, in crowned sovereignty, over us all, as the noblest, gentlest, yet strongest of rallying signs; indestructible".[166] The Victorians produced his plays as lavish spectacles on a grand scale.[167] The playwright and critic George Bernard Shaw mocked the cult of Shakespeare worship as "bardolatry". He claimed that the new naturalism of Ibsen's plays had made Shakespeare obsolete.[168]
The modernist revolution in the arts during the early twentieth century, far from discarding Shakespeare, eagerly enlisted his work in the service of the avant garde. The Expressionists in Germany and the Futurists in Moscow mounted productions of his plays. Marxist playwright and director Bertolt Brecht devised an epic theatre under the influence of Shakespeare. The poet and critic T. S. Eliot argued against Shaw that Shakespeare's "primitiveness" in fact made him truly modern.[169] Eliot, along with G. Wilson Knight and the school of New Criticism, led a movement towards a closer reading of Shakespeare's imagery. In the 1950s, a wave of new critical approaches replaced modernism and paved the way for "post-modern" studies of Shakespeare.[170] By the eighties, Shakespeare studies were open to movements such as structuralism, feminism, African American studies, and queer studies.[171]
Speculation about Shakespeare
[edit]Authorship
[edit]Around 150 years after Shakespeare's death, doubts began to emerge about the authorship of Shakespeare's works.[172] Alternative candidates proposed include Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, and Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford.[173] Although all alternative candidates are almost universally rejected in academic circles, popular interest in the subject, particularly the Oxfordian theory, has continued into the 21st century.[174]
Religion
[edit]Some scholars claim that members of Shakespeare's family were Catholics, at a time when Catholic practice was against the law.[175] Shakespeare's mother, Mary Arden, certainly came from a pious Catholic family. The strongest evidence might be a Catholic statement of faith signed by John Shakespeare, found in 1757 in the rafters of his former house in Henley Street. The document is now lost, however, and scholars differ on its authenticity.[176] In 1591, the authorities reported that John had missed church "for fear of process for debt", a common Catholic excuse.[177] In 1606, William's daughter Susanna was listed among those who failed to attend Easter communion in Stratford.[177] Scholars find evidence both for and against Shakespeare's Catholicism in his plays, but the truth may be impossible to prove either way.[178]
Sexuality
[edit]Few details of Shakespeare's sexuality are known. At 18, he married the 26-year-old Anne Hathaway, who was pregnant. Susanna, the first of their three children, was born six months later on 26 May 1583. However, over the centuries readers have pointed to Shakespeare's sonnets as evidence of his love for a young man. Others read the same passages as the expression of intense friendship rather than sexual love.[179] At the same time, the twenty-six so-called "Dark Lady" sonnets, addressed to a married woman, are taken as evidence of heterosexual liaisons.[180]
List of works
[edit]Classification of the plays
[edit]Shakespeare's works include the 36 plays printed in the First Folio of 1623, listed below according to their folio classification as comedies, histories and tragedies.[181] Shakespeare did not write every word of the plays attributed to him; and several show signs of collaboration, a common practice at the time.[182] Two plays not included in the First Folio, The Two Noble Kinsmen and Pericles, Prince of Tyre, are now accepted as part of the canon, with scholars agreed that Shakespeare made a major contribution to their composition.[183] No poems were included in the First Folio.
In the late nineteenth century, Edward Dowden classified four of the late comedies as romances, and though many scholars prefer to call them tragicomedies, his term is often used.[184] These plays and the associated Two Noble Kinsmen are marked with an asterisk (*) below. In 1896, Frederick S. Boas coined the term "problem plays" to describe four plays: All's Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure, Troilus and Cressida and Hamlet.[185] "Dramas as singular in theme and temper cannot be strictly called comedies or tragedies", he wrote. "We may therefore borrow a convenient phrase from the theatre of today and class them together as Shakespeare's problem plays."[186] The term, much debated and sometimes applied to other plays, remains in use, though Hamlet is definitively classed as a tragedy.[187] The other problem plays are marked below with a double dagger (‡).
Plays thought to be only partly written by Shakespeare are marked with a dagger (†) below. Other works occasionally attributed to him are listed as lost plays or apocrypha.
Works
[edit]Notes
[edit]- a. ^ Dates use the Julian calendar, used in England throughout Shakespeare's lifespan. Under the Gregorian calendar, which was adopted in Catholic countries in 1582, Shakespeare died on 3 May.[188]
- b. ^ The exact figures are unknown. See Shakespeare's collaborations and Shakespeare Apocrypha for further details.
- c. ^ An essay by Harold Brooks suggests Marlowe's Edward II influenced Shakespeare's Richard III.[189] Other scholars discount this, pointing out that the parallels are commonplace.[190]
- d. ^ Many scholars believe that Pericles was co-written with George Wilkins.[191]
- e. ^ The Two Noble Kinsmen was co-written with John Fletcher.[192]
- f. ^ Henry VI, Part 1 is often thought to be the work of a group of collaborators; but some scholars, for example Michael Hattaway, believe the play was wholly written by Shakespeare.[193]
- g. ^ Henry VIII was co-written with John Fletcher.[194]
- h. ^ Brian Vickers suggests that Titus Andronicus was co-written with George Peele, though Jonathan Bate, the play's most recent editor for the Arden Shakespeare, believes it to be wholly the work of Shakespeare.[195]
- i. ^ Brian Vickers and others believe that Timon of Athens was co-written with Thomas Middleton, though some commentators disagree.[196]
- j. ^ The text of Macbeth which survives has plainly been altered by later hands. Most notable is the inclusion of two songs from Thomas Middleton's play The Witch (1615).[197]
- k. ^ The Passionate Pilgrim, published under Shakespeare's name in 1599 without his permission, includes early versions of two of his sonnets, three extracts from Love's Labour's Lost, several poems known to be by other poets, and eleven poems of unknown authorship for which the attribution to Shakespeare has not been disproved.[198]
References
[edit]- ^ Greenblatt 2005, 11; Bevington 2002, 1–3; Wells 1997, 399.
- ^ Craig 2003, 3.
- ^ Shapiro 2005, xvii–xviii; Schoenbaum 1991, 41, 66, 397–98, 402, 409 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFSchoenbaum1991 (help); Taylor 1990, 145, 210–23, 261–5.
- ^ Bertolini 1993, 119.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 14–22.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 24–6.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 24, 296; Honan 1998, 15–16.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 23–24.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 62–63; Ackroyd 2006, 53; Wells, Stanley, "General Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xv–xvi.
- ^ Baldwin 1944, 464.
- ^ Baldwin 1944, 164–84; Cressy 1975, 28, 29.
- ^ Baldwin 1944, 164–66; Cressy 1975, 80–82; Ackroyd 2006, xvi.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 77–78.
- ^ Wood 2003, 84; Schoenbaum 1987, 78–79.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 93.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 94.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 224.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 95.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 97–108; Rowe 1709.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 144–45.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 110–11.
- ^ Honigmann 1999, 1; Wells, Stanley, "General Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xvii.
- ^ Honigmann 1999, 95–117; Wood 2003, 97–109.
- ^ Chambers 1930, Vol. 1: 287, 292.
- ^ Greenblatt 2005, 213.
- ^ Greenblatt 2005, 213; Schoenbaum 1987, 153.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 176.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 151–52.
- ^ Shakespeare 2005, 666.
- ^ Wells 2006, 28; Schoenbaum 1987, 144–46; Chambers 1930, Vol. 1: 59.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 184.
- ^ Chambers 1923, 208–209.
- ^ Chambers 1930, Vol. 2: 67–71.
- ^ Bentley 1961, 36.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 188; Kastan 1999, 37; Knutson 2001, 17
- ^ Adams 1923, 275
- ^ Wells 2006, 28.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 200.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 200–201.
- ^ Rowe 1709.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 357; Wells, Stanley, "General Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xxii.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 202–3.
- ^ Honan 1998, 121.
- ^ Shapiro 2005, 122.
- ^ Honan 1998, 325; Greenblatt 2005, 405.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 279.
- ^ Honan 1998, 375–78.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 276.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 476.
- ^ Honan 1998, 382–83.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 476.
- ^ Honan 1998, 326; Ackroyd 2006, 462–464.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 272–274.
- ^ Honan 1998, 387.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 25, 296.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 287.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 292, 294.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 304.
- ^ Honan 1998, 395–96.
- ^ Chambers 1930, Vol. 2: 8, 11, 104; Schoenbaum 1987, 296.
- ^ Chambers 1930, Vol. 2: 7, 9, 13; Schoenbaum 1987, 289, 318–19.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 483; Frye 2005, 16; Greenblatt 2005, 145–6.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 301–3.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 306–07; Wells, Stanley, "General Introduction", in Shakespeare 2005, xviii.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 308–10.
- ^ Dowden 1881, 48–9.
- ^ Frye 2005, 9; Honan 1998, 166.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 159–61; Frye 2005, 9.
- ^ Dutton & Howard 2003, 147.
- ^ Ribner 2005, 154–155.
- ^ Frye 2005, 105; Ribner 2005, 67; Cheney 2004, 100.
- ^ Honan 1998, 136; Schoenbaum 1987, 166.
- ^ Frye 2005, 91; Honan 1998, 116–117; Werner 2001, 96–100.
- ^ Friedman 2006, 159.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 235.
- ^ Wood 2003, 161–162.
- ^ Wood 2003, 205–206; Honan 1998, 258.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 359.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 362–383.
- ^ Shapiro 2005, 150; Gibbons 1993, 1; Ackroyd 2006, 356.
- ^ Wood 2003, 161; Honan 1998, 206.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 353, 358; Shapiro 2005, 151–153.
- ^ Shapiro 2005, 151.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 85; Muir 2005, 12–16.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 94.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 86.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 40, 48.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 42, 169, 195; Greenblatt 2005, 304.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 226; Ackroyd 2006, 423; Kermode 2004, 141–2.
- ^ McDonald 2006, 43–46.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 306.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 444; McDonald 2006, 69–70; Eliot 1934, 59.
- ^ Dowden 1881, 57.
- ^ Dowden 1881, 60; Frye 2005, 123; McDonald 2006, 15.
- ^ Shakespeare 2005, 1247, 1279.
- ^ Wells, Stanley, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xx.
- ^ Wells, Stanley, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xxi.
- ^ Shapiro 2005, 16.
- ^ Foakes 1990, 6; Shapiro 2005, 125–31.
- ^ Foakes 1990, 6; Nagler 1958, 7; Shapiro 2005, 131–2.
- ^ Wells, Stanley, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xxii.
- ^ Foakes 1990, 33.
- ^ Ackroyd 2006, 454; Holland, Peter, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2000a, xli.
- ^ Ringler 1997, 127.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 210; Chambers 1930, Vol. 1: 341.
- ^ Shapiro 2005, 247–9.
- ^ a b Shakespeare 2005, 1247.
- ^ Wells, Stanley, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xxxvii.
- ^ Wells, Stanley, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xxxiv.
- ^ Pollard 1909, xi.
- ^ Wells, Stanley, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xxxiv; Pollard 1909, xi; Maguire 1996, 28.
- ^ Bowers 1955, 8–10; Wells, Stanley, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2005, xxxiv–xxxv.
- ^ Shakespeare 2005, 909, 1153.
- ^ Rowe, John, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2006, 21.
- ^ Frye 2005, 288.
- ^ Rowe, John, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2006, 3, 21.
- ^ Rowe, John, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2006, 1; Jackson 2004, 267–294; Honan 1998, 289.
- ^ Rowe, John, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2006, 1; Honan 1998, 289; Schoenbaum 1987, 327.
- ^ Shakespeare 1914.
- ^ Wood 2003, 178; Schoenbaum 1987, 180.
- ^ Honan 1998, 180.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 268.
- ^ Honan 1998, 180; Schoenbaum 1987, 180.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, 268–269.
- ^ Wood 2003, 177.
- ^ Clemen 2005a, 150.
- ^ Frye 2005, 105, 177; Clemen 2005b, 29.
- ^ Brooke, Nicholas, "Language and Speaker in Macbeth", 69; and Bradbrook, M.C., "Shakespeare's Recollection of Marlowe", 195: both in Edwards, Ewbank & Hunter 2004.
- ^ Clemen 2005b, 63.
- ^ Frye 2005, 185.
- ^ a b Wright 2004, 868.
- ^ Bradley 1991, 91.
- ^ a b McDonald 2006, 42–6.
- ^ McDonald 2006, 36, 39, 75.
- ^ Gibbons 1993, 4.
- ^ Gibbons 1993, 1–4.
- ^ Gibbons 1993, 1–7, 15.
- ^ McDonald 2006, 13; Meagher 2003, 358.
- ^ Chambers 1944, 35.
- ^ Levenson, Jill L., "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2000d, 49–50.
- ^ Clemen 1987, 179.
- ^ Steiner 1996, 145.
- ^ Taylor 2006, 38.
- ^ Kolin 1985, 124.
- ^ Gager 1996, 163, 186, 251.
- ^ Bryant 1998, 82.
- ^ Gross, John, "Shakespeare's Influence" in Wells & Orlin 2003, 641–2..
- ^ Porter & Teich 1988, 48; Lambourne 1999, 193–8.
- ^ Paraisz 2006, 130.
- ^ Royle 2000.
- ^ Crystal 2001, 55–65, 74.
- ^ Wain 1975, 194.
- ^ Johnson 2002, 12; Crystal 2001, 63.
- ^ Johnson, Ben, "To the memory of my beloued, The AVTHOR MR. WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE: AND what he hath left vs." in Shakespeare 1996a, 10.
- ^ Dominik 1988, 9; Grady 2001b, 267.
- ^ Grady 2001b, 265; Greer 1986, 9.
- ^ Grady 2001b, 266.
- ^ Grady 2001b, 266–7.
- ^ Grady 2001b, 269.
- ^ Dryden 1889, 71.
- ^ Grady 2001b, 270–27; Levin 1986, 217.
- ^ Dobson, Michael (1992). The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0198183232. Cited by Grady 2001b, 270.
- ^ Grady cites Voltaire's Philosophical Letters (1733); Goethe's Wilhelm Meister's Apprenticeship (1795); Stendhal's two-part pamphlet Racine et Shakespeare (1823–5); and Victor Hugo's prefaces to Cromwell (1827) and William Shakespeare (1864). Grady 2001b, 272–274.
- ^ Levin 1986, 223.
- ^ Sawyer 2003, 113.
- ^ Carlyle 1907, 161.
- ^ Schoch 2002, 58–59.
- ^ Grady 2001b, 276.
- ^ Grady 2001a, 22–6.
- ^ Grady 2001a, 24.
- ^ Grady 2001a, 29.
- ^ McMichael & Glenn 1962.
- ^ Gibson 2005, 48, 72, 124.
- ^ Kathman, David, "The Question of Authorship" in Wells & Orlin 2003, 620, 625–626; Love 2002, 194–209; Schoenbaum 1991, 430–40 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFSchoenbaum1991 (help); Holderness 1988, 137, 173.
- ^ Pritchard 1979, 3.
- ^ Wood 2003, 75–8; Ackroyd 2006, 22–3.
- ^ a b Wood 2003, 78; Ackroyd 2006, 416; Schoenbaum 1987, 41–2, 286.
- ^ Wilson 2004, 34; Shapiro 2005, 167.
- ^ Casey ; Pequigney 1985; Shakespeare 1996b, 132.
- ^ Fort 1927, 406–414.
- ^ Boyce 1996, 91, 193, 513..
- ^ Thomson, Peter, "Conventions of Playwriting". in Wells & Orlin 2003, 49.
- ^ Kathman, David, "The Question of Authorship" in Wells & Orlin 2003, 629; Boyce 1996, 91.
- ^ Edwards 1958, 1–10; Snyder, Susan, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2007.
- ^ Schanzer 1963, 1–10.
- ^ Boas 1896, 345.
- ^ Schanzer 1963, 1; Bloom 1999, 325–380; Berry 2005, 37.
- ^ Schoenbaum 1987, xv.
- ^ Morris 1968, 65–94.
- ^ Taylor 1988, 116.
- ^ Bloom 1999, 30; Hoeniger, F. D. "Introduction" in Shakespeare 1963; Jackson 2003, 83.
- ^ Potter, Lois, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 1997, 1–6.
- ^ Burns, Edward, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2000b, 73–84; Hattaway, Michael, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 1990, 43.
- ^ McMullan, Gordon, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 2000c, 198.
- ^ Vickers 2002, 8; Dillon 2007, 25.
- ^ Vickers 2002, 8; Dominik 1988, 16; Farley-Hills 1990, 171–172.
- ^ Brooke, Nicholas, "Introduction" in Shakespeare 1998, 57.
- ^ Shakespeare 2005, 805.
- ^ Bradford 1910, 51–56; Freehafer 1969, 501–513.
Bibliography
[edit]- Ackroyd, Peter (2006), Shakespeare: The Biography, London: Vintage, ISBN 0749386558
{{citation}}
: Check|isbn=
value: checksum (help). - Adams, Joseph Quincy (1923), A Life of William Shakespeare, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, OCLC 1935264.
- Baldwin, T. W. (1944), William Shakspere's Small Latine & Lesse Greek, vol. 1, Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois Press, OCLC 359037.
- Bentley, G. E. (1961), Shakespeare: A Biographical Handbook, New Haven: Yale University Press, OCLC 356416.
- Berry, Ralph (2005), Changing Styles in Shakespeare, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415353165.
- Bertolini, John Anthony (1993), Shaw and Other Playwrights, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, ISBN 027100908X.
- Bevington, David (2002), Shakespeare, Oxford: Blackwell, ISBN 0631227199.
- Bloom, Harold (1999), Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, New York: Riverhead Books, ISBN 157322751X.
- Boas, F. S. (1896), Shakspere and His Predecessors, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
- Bowers, Fredson (1955), On Editing Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Dramatists, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, OCLC 2993883.
- Boyce, Charles (1996), Dictionary of Shakespeare, Ware, Herts, UK: Wordsworth, ISBN 1853263729.
- Bradford, Gamaliel Jr. (February 1910), "The History of Cardenio by Mr. Fletcher and Shakespeare", Modern Language Notes, 25 (2).
- Bradley, A. C. (1991), Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth, London: Penguin, ISBN 0140530193.
- Bryant, John (1998), "Moby Dick as Revolution", in Levine, Robert Steven (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Herman Melville, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 052155571X.
- Carlyle, Thomas (1907), Adams, John Chester (ed.), On Heroes, Hero-worship, and the Heroic in History, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, OCLC 643782.
- Casey, Charles (Fall 1998), "Was Shakespeare gay? Sonnet 20 and the politics of pedagogy", College Literature, 25 (3), retrieved 2007-05-02.
- Chambers, E. K. (1923), The Elizabethan Stage, vol. 2, Oxford: Clarendon Press, OCLC 336379.
- Chambers, E. K. (1944), Shakespearean Gleanings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, OCLC 2364570.
- Chambers, E. K. (1930), William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, OCLC 353406.
- Cheney, Patrick Gerard (2004), The Cambridge Companion to Christopher Marlowe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521527341.
- Clemen, Wolfgang (2005a), Shakespeare's Dramatic Art: Collected Essays, New York: Routledge, ISBN 0415352789.
- Clemen, Wolfgang (2005b), Shakespeare's Imagery, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415352800.
- Clemen, Wolfgang (1987), Shakespeare's Soliloquies, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415352770.
- Craig, Leon Harold (2003), Of Philosophers and Kings: Political Philosophy in Shakespeare's "Macbeth" and "King Lear", Toronto: University of Toronto Press, ISBN 0802086055.
- Cressy, David (1975), Education in Tudor and Stuart England, New York: St Martin's Press, OCLC 2148260.
- Crystal, David (2001), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521401798.
- Dillon, Janette (2007), The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare's Tragedies, Cambridge, ISBN 0521858178
{{citation}}
: Text "publisherCambridge University Press" ignored (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Dominik, Mark (1988), Shakespeare–Middleton Collaborations, Beaverton, OR: Alioth Press, ISBN 0945088019.
- Dowden, Edward (1881), Shakspere, New York: Appleton & Co., OCLC 8164385.
- Dryden, John (1889), Arnold, Thomas (ed.), An Essay of Dramatic Poesy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, OCLC 7847292.
- Dutton, Richard; Howard, Jean (2003), A Companion to Shakespeare's Works: The Histories, Oxford: Blackwell, ISBN 0631226338.
- Edwards, Phillip (1958), "Shakespeare's Romances: 1900–1957", in Nicoll, Allardyce (ed.), Shakespeare Survey, vol. 11, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, OCLC 15880120.
- Edwards, Philip; Ewbank, Inga-Stina; Hunter, G. K., eds. (2004), Shakespeare's Styles: Essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521616948.
- Eliot, T. S. (1934), Elizabethan Essays, London: Faber & Faber, OCLC 9738219.
- Farley-Hills, David (1990), Shakespeare and the Rival Playwrights, 1600–06, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415040507.
- Foakes, R. A. (1990), "Playhouses and Players", in Braunmuller, A.; Hattaway, Michael (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to English Renaissance Drama, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521386624.
- Fort, J. A. (October 1927), "The Story Contained in the Second Series of Shakespeare's Sonnets", The Review of English Studies, 3 (12).
- Freehafer, John (May 1969), "'Cardenio', by Shakespeare and Fletcher", PMLA, 84 (3).
- Friedman, Michael D. (2006), "'I'm not a feminist director but...': Recent Feminist Productions of The Taming of the Shrew", in Nelsen, Paul; Schlueter, June (eds.), Acts of Criticism: Performance Matters in Shakespeare and his Contemporaries: Essays in Honor of James P. Lusardi, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, ISBN 0838640591.
- Frye, Roland Mushat (2005), The Art of the Dramatist, London; New York: Routledge, ISBN 0415352894.
- Gager, Valerie L. (1996), Shakespeare and Dickens: The Dynamics of Influence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 052145526X.
- Gibbons, Brian (1993), Shakespeare and Multiplicity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521444063.
- Gibson, H. N. (2005), The Shakespeare Claimants: A Critical Survey of the Four Principal Theories Concerning the Authorship of the Shakespearean Plays, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415352908.
- Grady, Hugh (2001a), "Modernity, Modernism and Postmodernism in the Twentieth Century's Shakespeare", in Bristol, Michael; McLuskie, Kathleen (eds.), Shakespeare and Modern Theatre: The Performance of Modernity, New York: Routledge, ISBN 0415219841.
- Grady, Hugh (2001b), "Shakespeare Criticism 1600–1900", in deGrazia, Margreta; Wells, Stanley (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521650941.
- Greenblatt, Stephen (2005), Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare, London: Pimlico, ISBN 0712600981.
- Greer, Germaine (1986), William Shakespeare, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0192875388.
- Holderness, Graham (1988), The Shakespeare Myth, Manchester: Manchester University Press, ISBN 0719026350.
- Honan, Park (1998), Shakespeare: A Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0198117922.
- Honigmann, E. A. J. (1999), Shakespeare: The Lost Years (Revised ed.), Manchester: Manchester University Press, ISBN 0719054257.
- Jackson, MacD. P. (2004), "A Lover's Complaint Revisited", in Zimmerman, Susan (ed.), Shakespeare Studies, Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Press, ISBN 0838641202.
- Jackson, Macdonald P. (2003), Defining Shakespeare: Pericles as Test Case, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0199260508.
- Johnson, Samuel (2002), Lynch, Jack (ed.), Samuel Johnson's Dictionary: Selections from the 1755 Work that Defined the English Language, Delray Beach, FL: Levenger Press, ISBN 184354296X.
- Kastan, David Scott (1999), Shakespeare After Theory, London: Routledge, ISBN 041590112X.
- Kermode, Frank (2004), The Age of Shakespeare, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, ISBN 029784881X.
- Kolin, Philip C. (1985), Shakespeare and Southern Writers: A Study in Influence, Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, ISBN 0878052550.
- Knutson, Roslyn (2001), Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare's Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521772427.
- Lambourne, Lionel (1999), Victorian Painting, London: Phaidon, ISBN 0714837768.
- Levin, Harry (1986), "Critical Approaches to Shakespeare from 1660 to 1904", in Wells, Stanley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521318416.
- Love, Harold (2002), Attributing Authorship: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521789486.
- Maguire, Laurie E. (1996), Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The "Bad" Quartos and Their Contexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521473640.
- McDonald, Russ (2006), Shakespeare's Late Style, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521820685.
- McMichael, George; Glenn, Edgar M. (1962), Shakespeare and his Rivals: A Casebook on the Authorship Controversy, New York: Odyssey Press, OCLC 2113359.
- Meagher, John C. (2003), Pursuing Shakespeare's Dramaturgy: Some Contexts, Resources, and Strategies in his Playmaking, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, ISBN 0838639933.
- Morris, Brian Robert (1968), Christopher Marlowe, New York: Hill and Wang, ISBN 0809067803.
- Muir, Kenneth (2005), Shakespeare's Tragic Sequence, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415353254.
- Nagler, A. M. (1958), Shakespeare's Stage, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, ISBN 0300026897.
- Paraisz, Júlia (2006), "The Nature of a Romantic Edition", in Holland, Peter (ed.), Shakespeare Survey, vol. 59, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521868386.
- Pequigney, Joseph (1985), Such Is My Love: A Study of Shakespeare's Sonnets, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0226655636.
- Pollard, Alfred W. (1909), Shakespeare Quartos and Folios: A Study in the Bibliography of Shakespeare's Plays, 1594-1685, London: Methuen, OCLC 46308204.
- Porter, Roy; Teich, Mikuláš (1988), Romanticism in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521339138.
- Pritchard, Arnold (1979), Catholic Loyalism in Elizabethan England, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, ISBN 0807813451.
- Ribner, Irving (2005), The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415353149.
- Ringler, William, Jr. (1997), "Shakespeare and His Actors: Some Remarks on King Lear", in Ogden, James; Scouten, Arthur Hawley (eds.), In Lear from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, ISBN 083863690X
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link). - Rowe, Nicholas (1709), Gray, Terry A. (ed.), Some Acount of the Life &c. of Mr. William Shakespear, Online at Mr. William Shakespeare and the Internet (published 1997), retrieved 2007-07-30
{{citation}}
: External link in
(help).|place=
- Royle, Nicholas (2000), "To Be Announced", in Morra, Joanne; Robson, Mark; Smith, Marquard (eds.), The Limits of Death: Between Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press, ISBN 0719057515.
- Sawyer, Robert (2003), Victorian Appropriations of Shakespeare, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, ISBN 0838639704.
- Schanzer, Ernest (1963), The Problem Plays of Shakespeare, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, OCLC 2378165.
- Schoch, Richard (2002), "Pictorial Shakespeare", in Wells, Stanley; Stanton, Sarah (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Stage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 052179711X.
- Schoenbaum, Samuel (1991), Shakespeare's Lives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0198186185.
- Schoenbaum, Samuel (1987), William Shakespeare: A Compact Documentary Life (Revised ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0195051610.
- Shakespeare, William (2000a), Holland, Peter (ed.), Cymbeline, London: Penguin, ISBN 0140714723.
- Shakespeare, William (1996a), Hinman, Charlton; Blayney, Peter W. (eds.), The First Folio of Shakespeare (2nd ed.), New York: W. W. Norton & Company, ISBN 0393039854.
- Shakespeare, William (1990), Hattaway, Michael (ed.), The First Part of King Henry VI, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 052129634X.
- Shakespeare, William (2000b), Burns, Edward (ed.), King Henry VI, Part 1, London: Arden Shakespeare, Thomson, ISBN 1903436435.
- Shakespeare, William (2000c), McMullan, Gordon (ed.), King Henry VIII, London: Arden Shakespeare, Thomson, ISBN 1903436257.
- Shakespeare, William (2005), Wells, Stanley; Taylor, Gary; Jowett, John; Montgomery, William (eds.), The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0199267170.
- Shakespeare, William (1963), Hoeniger, F. D. (ed.), Pericles, London: Arden Shakespeare, ISBN 0174435886l
{{citation}}
: Check|isbn=
value: invalid character (help). - Shakespeare, William (2006), Rowe, John (ed.), The Poems: Venus and Adonis, The Rape of Lucrece, The Phoenix and the Turtle, The Passionate Pilgrim, A Lover's Complaint, by William Shakespeare (2nd revised ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521855519.
- Shakespeare, William (2000d), Levenson, Jill L. (ed.), Romeo and Juliet, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0192814966.
- Shakespeare, William (1914), "Sonnet 18", in Craig, W. J. (ed.), [http://www.bartleby.com/70/ The Oxford Shakespeare: the Complete Works of William Shakespeare] (Bartleby.com (2000) ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, retrieved 2007-06-22
{{citation}}
: External link in
(help).|title=
- Shakespeare, William (1996b), Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.), The Sonnets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521222257.
- Shakespeare, William (1998), Brooke, Nicholas (ed.), The Tragedy of Macbeth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0192834177.
- Shakespeare, William (1997), Potter, Lois (ed.), The Two Noble Kinsmen, London: Arden Shakespeare, Thomson, ISBN 1904271189.
- Shakespeare, William (2007), Snyder, Susan; Curren-Aquino, Deborah (eds.), The Winter's Tale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521221587.
- Shapiro, James (2005), 1599: A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare, London: Faber and Faber, ISBN 0571214800.
- Steiner, George (1996), The Death of Tragedy, New Haven: Yale University Press, ISBN 0300069162.
- Taylor, Dennis (2006), "Hardy and Hamlet", in Wilson, Keith (ed.), Thomas Hardy Reappraised: Essays in Honour of Michael Millgate, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, ISBN 0802039553. Internal citation to Millgate and Wilson needs to be changed to Taylor 2006, 38.
- Taylor, Gary (1990), Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present, London: Hogarth Press, ISBN 0701208880.
- Taylor, Gary (1988), William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0198129149.
- Vickers, Brian (2002), Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0199256535.
- Wain, John (1975), Samuel Johnson, New York: Viking, ISBN 0670616710.
- Wells, Stanley (1997), Shakespeare: A Life in Drama, New York: W. W. Norton, ISBN 0393315622.
- Wells, Stanley (2006), Shakespeare & Co, New York: Pantheon, ISBN 0375424946.
- Wells, Stanley; Orlin, Lena Cowen, eds. (2003), Shakespeare: An Oxford Guide, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0199245223.
- Werner, Sarah (2001), Shakespeare and Feminist Performance, London: Routledge, ISBN 0415227291.
- Wilson, Richard (2004), Secret Shakespeare: Studies in Theatre, Religion and Resistance, Manchester: Manchester University Press, ISBN 0719070244.
- Wood, Michael (2003), Shakespeare, New York: Basic Books, ISBN 0465092640.
- Wright, George T. (2004), "The Play of Phrase and Line", in McDonald, Russ (ed.), Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945–2000, Oxford: Blackwell, ISBN 0631234888.
Further reading
[edit]- Bryson, Bill (2007) Shakespeare: The World as Stage (Eminent Lives). Harper Collins. ISBN 000719790X
- Greenblatt, Stephen (2005). Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. Pimlico. ISBN 0712600981
- Honan, Park (1998). Shakespeare: A Life. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198117922
- Masefield, John. William Shakespeare
- Schoenbaum, Samuel (1991). Shakespeare's Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198186185.
- Vendler, Helen (1997). The Art of Shakespeare's Sonnets. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674637127
- Wells, Stanley, et al (2005). The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199267170