Talk:William Tappan Thompson
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on William Tappan Thompson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/13/the-birth-of-the-stainless-banner/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Good evidence that Second National Flag ("Stainless Banner") designed at suggestion of General Beauregard
[edit]“Richmond, Saturday, May 2 ….Gen Beauregard suggested the flag just adopted, or else a field of blue in place of the white.”
-Charleston Mercury ("Letter from Richmond"), May 5, 1863, p. 1, c. 1
"In the month of April, [1863], there was some question in the Confederate Congress about changing the form and arrangement of their flag, and in reference to it, Beauregard, on the 24th of April, wrote to a friend: 'Why change our battle-flag, consecrated by the best blood of our country on so many battlefields? A good design for the national flag would be the present battle-flag as Union Jack, and the rest all white or all blue.' This idea was adopted by Congress, on the 1st of May, and thenceforth the Confederate flag was a white field,—-the length double the width, with the union to be a square of two-thirds the width of the flag, having the ground red, thereon a broad saltire of blue, bordered with white, and emblazoned white mullets or five-pointed stars, corresponding in number to the Confederate States."
-William Parker Snow, Southern Generals: Who they are, and what they have done (1865), 246. [1]
Two more editions of the same work were titled- Southern Generals: Their Lives and Campaigns (1866) and Lee and his Generals (1867).
- Beauregard letter to Congressman Villere, April 24, 1863.[2]
- Historians John Coski (Museum of the Confederacy) and Robert Bonner (Professor of History, Dartmouth) have published books and articles on the Confederate flag. Neither of them give Thompson credit for designing the second national flag.
A JSTOR account is needed to access this article. The accounts are free for a limited number of articles-
"General Beauregard, whose earlier penchant for practicality had established the precedent for visual distinctiveness on the battlefield, proposed that 'a good design for the national flag would be the present battle-flag as Union Jack, and the rest all white or all blue.' This measure--placing the star-cross design in the upper corner of an otherwise monochromatic flag--would allow the civilian ensign to signal distress while incorporating that image that had been, in Beauregard's words, 'consecrated by the best blood of our country on so many battle-fields.' The final version of the second national flag, adopted May 1, 1863, did just this: it set the St. Andrew's Cross of stars in the Union Jack with the rest of the civilian banner entirely white. [1]
Not surprisingly, the Confederate editors, poets, and songwriters who had done the most to shape flag culture applied their energies in the spring of 1863 to making sense of this new national flag. The Savannah Morning News had lobbied for the white banner as a sign that 'we are fighting to maintain the Heaven ordained supremacy of the white man over the inferior or colored race,' predicting that it would 'be hailed by the civilized world as THE WHITE MAN'S FLAG.' Yet these racial connotations of whiteness were displaced by the flag's almost immediate association with the death of Stonewall Jackson, whose martyrdom would imbue this banner with the same sort of solemnity that the death of civilian James Jackson in the defense of the Stars and Bars had elicited. The unveiling of the new flag at Stonewall Jackson's funeral earned the colorless field the nickname of 'the Stainless Banner.'"
-Bonner, Robert E., "Flag Culture and the Consolidation of Confederate Nationalism." Journal of Southern History, Vol. 68, No. 2 (May 2002), 318-319.
Beauregard proposed and the Savannah Morning News lobbied. Lobbying is far from designing. He doesn't even mention Thompson by name. -BorderRuffian
References
- ^ [Cited in article:]...Richmond Enquirer, April 24, 1863, p. 2, c. 2; Charleston Daily Courier, May 5, 1863, p. 1, c. 1 (Beauregard quotations).
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Ohio articles
- Unknown-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles