Talk:Wirefly

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. Despite there being no discussion, I'm going to deny this move. There's nothing stopping you from writing a Simplexity article. This would allow three articles: one for InPhonic, one for the website, and one for Simplexity. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wirefly → Simplexity, LLC – "Wirefly" is really two different things: a defunct subsidiary of InPhonic and a current subsidiary of Simplexity, LLC which currently has no article. Since the new Wirefly does not share the corrupt business practices which bankrupted InPhonic, it seems reaasonable to separate the Simplexity" Wirefly from its corrupt predecessor "InPhonic" Wirefly by focusing both articles on the coprporations rather than the website/domain owned by each at different times. 214.4.238.180 (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wirefly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429202708/http://bankruptcy.morrisjames.com/2014/03/delaware-chapter-11-filings-2/simplexity-llc-and-two-affiliates-file-chapter-11/ to http://bankruptcy.morrisjames.com/2014/03/delaware-chapter-11-filings-2/simplexity-llc-and-two-affiliates-file-chapter-11/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]