Talk:Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Merger proposal

McMillan Memorial Library does not meet notability criteria in and of itself, but is an important public service within Wisconsin Rapids. I propose merging it into Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin. 32.218.38.11 (talk) 04:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can support this, go ahead with the merge.--Rusf10 (talk) 04:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not appropriate to consolidate the two articles as this article's focus is specific. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 15:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I belive we can keep the wiki of McMillan Memorial Libary because if people find that wiki they may be interested and come to this wiki. I am open to any objections. WRGoalie88 (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Detail

CLOSING AS NONSENSE

I'm sorry, but that's not how this works. John from Idegon (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose that the page should have detail and should be only edited by citizens of the Greater Wisconsin Rapids Area of ages 13 or older.

Reasons 1. People that aren't citizens of Wiscosin Rapids don't know most about this great town. 2. Information without detail isn't proper. 3. Details like "the (historic) Witter Feild." may bring users to learn about Witter Feild. 4. Ages below 13 aren't mature enough to understand certain details and may mess up with many things when editing.

Again, I propose that the page should have detail and should be only edited by citizens of the Greater Wisconsin Rapids Area of ages 13 or older. WRGoalie88 (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WRGoalie88 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This proposal goes against the core tenet of Wikipedia, that anybody can edit anything. As for your reasons, number one is easily proved wrong by a quick search of resources such as Newspapers.com. I'm not from Rapids and I still know that Vince Biegel was a Lincoln product. I am confused as to what prompted your reason number two. As for reason number three, Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy dispels that one. Wikipedia is an unbiased dispenser of information, not an extravagant storytelling agency. Number four also seems unprompted to me, I'd like to hear some reasoning behind that. (And I'd encourage you to spellcheck next time to increase the effectiveness of your argument.) Please also keep in mind that per Wikipedia's promotional policy, there should be no external links in any sections of the page besides the designated "External links" section. Regards, Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.