Talk:Worcester Warriors
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POV bias
[edit]This reads to much like a fansite. If you are the gentleman (or lady) with an IP address and no sign in name, then thank you very much for your contribution. It is very difficult to find info on Worcester Rugby on the internet, but could you please read NPOV.GordyB 21:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Worcester warriors badge.png
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Worcester warriors badge.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Just a minder edit, it did say that after xmas they beat such teams as Gloucester, Leicester, and Sale. i have gotten rid of Gloucester from this as Worcester have never in their history beaten Gloucester. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.227.140 (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Women
[edit]Worcesters women players are frequently international winners as well ... but no mention of them here Victuallers (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Worcester RFC
[edit]When I was looking for details on Worcester RFC I'm forwarded to this page.
Are the current Worcester RFC one and the same?
If so they're not mentioned at all. The article suggests that the club simply disappeared.
If not, then I shouldn't be redirected here when searching for "Worcester RFC".
[1]http://worcesterrfc.rfu.club/ KenSharp (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Worcester RFC split away from the Warriors only recently. I think 2016. So the article probably hasn't been updated since. The grassroots Worcester RFC wouldn't be considered a generally notable club for its own article I think. Unlike Wasps or Gosforth it didn't really achieve anything notable in the amateur era, and unlike Sale F.C. are not notable as a new entity. If you wanted to edit the article to add a section on the split and change the re-direct to that section I think that would be entirely appropriate.Skeene88 (talk) 12:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)