Talk:Mengal
This article was nominated for deletion on July 9, 2007. The result of the discussion was withdrawn. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Mengal is not a jadgal baloch tribe but a Brahui baloch tribe
Let us upgrade
[edit]For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 03:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mengal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080811202909/http://www.dawn.com/weekly/dmag/archive/060212/dmag1.htm to http://dawn.com/weekly/dmag/archive/060212/dmag1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mengal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723215814/http://chowk.com/articles/balochistan-militancy-an-insiders-view-Rafi-Bhatti.htm to http://www.chowk.com/articles/balochistan-militancy-an-insiders-view-Rafi-Bhatti.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071209101024/http://www.senate.gov.pk/ShowMemberDetail.asp?MemberCode=442&CatCode=0&CatName= to http://www.senate.gov.pk/ShowMemberDetail.asp?MemberCode=442&CatCode=0&CatName=
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://news.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/bnpm-leader-shot-dead-in-kalat-400
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Jat
[edit]In the article state cited:
:ccording to the official list by Mir Ahmad Yar, the last Khan of Kalat, Mengal was originally one of the Jaṭṭ tribes inhabiting Balochistan
but the source doesn't support the material as iranicaonline
- Elfenbein, Josef (1989). "Brahui". In Yarshater, Ehsan (ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica. Vol. IV/4: Bolbol I–Brick. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. pp. 433–443. ISBN 978-0-71009-127-7.
:The tribes now making up the “Brahui nation” are twenty-seven in number; eight of them “nuclear” and nineteen “peripheral.” The list in Table 13 is based on the official list of Mīr Aḥmad Yār, the last khan of Kalat. It is to be noted that at the height of the confederacy in the 18th century the traditional list included only fifteen tribes (the eight “nuclear” tribes and nos. 10-12, 14-17). All tribes now have members living in the large towns. The largest of the “peripheral” tribes is the Mengal. This tribe and nos. 9, 10, and 15 comprise more than 80 percent of the population of this group.
it doesn't say that. I've removed that personal commentary. Balash-Vologases (talk) 05:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Have you really gone through the table? This is what it notes
"Traditional origins in parenthesis"
.[1], and later notes their origin to be Jaṭṭ. It's supported by the source. Sutyarashi (talk) 09:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)- You added Jat in the text citing Encyclopædia Iranica as source to proof your statement, but I found no such mention in that source. Please quote where in the source it cites Mengal and Zehri are the Jat!!
- and where is the table in that source?
- Haven't checked the rest of the cited citations yet. Balash-Vologases (talk) 15:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I just checked the citation, and you're right - But it cites Habitat above chagai, Saravan, Jahlavan and etc. It indicates location, not origin or root. Didn't cite Mengal is Jat.Balash-Vologases (talk) 15:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- "Traditional origins in parenthesis", go through the table again. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Reverted. Balash-Vologases (talk) 17:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- "Traditional origins in parenthesis", go through the table again. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)