The Hum is a phenomenon, or collection of phenomena, involving widespread reports of a persistent and invasive low-frequency humming, rumbling, or droning noise not audible to all people. Hums have been widely reported by national media in the UK and the United States. The Hum is sometimes prefixed with the name of a locality where the problem has been particularly publicized: e.g., the "Bristol Hum" or the "Taos Hum".
Data from a Taos Hum study suggests that around two percent of the population could detect the Taos Hum. For those who report being able to hear the Hum it can be a very disturbing phenomenon, though there is skepticism as to whether it has physical existence; it is distinct from, and should not be confused with, the term sometimes used to describe the well-attested phenomenon of microseisms.
The essential element that defines the Hum is what is perceived as a persistent low-frequency sound, often described as being comparable to that of a distant diesel engine idling, or to some similar low-pitched sound for which obvious sources (e.g., household appliances, traffic noise, etc.) have been ruled out. There are a number of audio reproductions of the Hum available on the web, as well as at least one purported recording.
Other elements seem to be significantly associated with the Hum, being reported by an important proportion of hearers, but not by all of them. Some people hear the Hum only, or much more, inside buildings as compared with outdoors. Some perceive vibrations that can be felt through the body. Earplugs are reported as not decreasing it. For those who can hear the Hum, it can be a very disturbing phenomenon and it has been linked to at least three suicides in the UK.
A study into the Taos Hum indicated that at least two percent could hear it; each hearer at a different frequency between 32 Hz and 80 Hz, modulated from 0.5 to 2 Hz. Similar results have been found in an earlier British study. It seems to be possible for hearers to move away from it, with one hearer of the Taos Hum reporting its range was 48 km. There are approximately equal percentages of male and female hearers. Age does appear to be a factor, with middle aged people being more likely to hear it.:43
In 2006 Tom Moir of the Massey University in Auckland, New Zealand, believes he has made several recordings of the Auckland Hum. His previous research using simulated sounds had indicated that the hum was around 56 hertz. The Taos Hum was between 32 to 80 hertz.
Among those who cannot hear the hum and some specialists, there has been skepticism about whether it exists. In 2009, the head of audiology at Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge, David Baguley, said he believed people's problems with hum were based on the physical world about one-third of the time, and stemmed from people focusing too keenly on innocuous background sounds the other two-thirds of the time. His current research focuses on using psychology and relaxation techniques to minimise the distress, which leads to a quieting or even removal of the noise.
Geoff Leventhall, a noise and vibration expert, has suggested cognitive behavioral therapy may be effective in helping those affected. "It's a question of whether you tense up to the noise or are relaxed about it. The CBT was shown to work, by helping people to take a different attitude to it."
There has been little mainstream attention. Only a handful of articles have been published in scientific literature, including: Leventhall, 2004, 2003; Cowan, 2003; Mullins & Kelly, 1998, 1995; Broner, 1978; Vasudevan & Gordon, 1977. Others publications include: Frosch, 2013, Deming, 2004; Fox, 1989; Wilson, 1979; Hanlon, 1973.
The Hum has been reported worldwide.
Although an obvious candidate, given the common description of the hum as sounding like a diesel engine, the majority of reported hums have not been traced to a specific mechanical source.
In the case of Kokomo, Indiana, a city with heavy industry, the origin of the hum was thought to have been traced to two sources. The first was a 36 hertz tone from a cooling tower at the local DaimlerChrysler casting plant and the second was a 10 hertz tone from an air compressor intake at the Haynes International plant. After those devices were corrected, however, reports of the hum persisted.
Two hums have been linked to mechanical sources. The West Seattle Hum was traced to a vacuum pump used by CalPortland to offload cargo from ships. After CalPortland replaced the silencers on the machine, reports of the hum ceased. Likewise, the Wellington Hum is thought to have been due to the diesel generator on a visiting ship. A third hum in Windsor, Ontario is likely to have originated from a steelworks on the industrial zone of Zug Island.
A suggested diagnosis of tinnitus, a disturbance of the auditory system, is used by some physicians in response to complaints about the Hum. Tinnitus is generated internally by the auditory and nervous systems, with no external stimulus. However, the theory that the Hum is actually tinnitus fails to explain why some hearers report that the Hum can be heard only at certain geographical locations.
While the Hum is hypothesized by some to be a form of low frequency tinnitus such as the venous hum, some sufferers claim it is not internal, being worse inside their homes than outside. However, others insist that it is equally bad indoors and outdoors. Some people notice the Hum only at home, while others hear it everywhere they go. Some sufferers report that it is made worse by soundproofing (e.g., double glazing), which serves only to decrease other environmental noise, thus making the Hum more apparent.
Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions
Human ears generate their own noises, called spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). Various studies have showed that 38-60% of adults with normal hearing have them, although the majority are unaware of these sounds. The people who do hear these sounds typically hear a faint buzzing or ringing, especially if they are otherwise in complete silence.
Researchers who looked at the Taos Hum considered otoacoustic emissions as a possibility, and eventually concluded that this was likely the case. Frosch has suggested that the Hum has many properties similar to those attributed to SOAE.
One of the possible causes of the West Seattle Hum considered was that it was related to the midshipman fish, also known as a toadfish. A previous hum in Sausalito, California, also on the west coast of the United States, was determined to be the mating call of the male midshipman. However, in that case the hum was resonating through houseboat hulls and affecting the people living on those boats. In the West Seattle case, the University of Washington researcher determined that it would be impossible for any resonating hum, transmitted via tanker or boat hulls, to be transmitted very far inland; certainly not far enough to account for the reports.
The Scottish Association for Marine Science hypothesised that the nocturnal humming sound heard in Hythe, Hampshire in the UK could be produced by a similar "sonic" fish. The council believed this to be unlikely because such fish are not commonly found in inshore waters of the UK. As of February 2014 the source had not been located, although the sound has now been recorded.
In popular culture
- "Have you heard The Hum?". Mail Online. 20 May 2009.
- Dunning, Brian (March 2008). "Can You Hear The Hum?". Skeptoid.
- "Humdinger". The Guardian. 22 July 2004.
- "The mystery of the Taos hum" (PDF). Acoustical Society of America. Autumn 1995.
- "Mystery of people who hear the hum". New Scientist. 13 December 1979. pp. 868–870.
- "Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...?". People. 21 September 1992.
- "The Phenomenon of Low Frequency Hums". Norfolk Tinnitus Society. 1993.
- "A Review of Published Research on Low Frequency Noise and its Effects" (PDF). Defra. May 2003.
- "Auckland North Shore Hum". T.J.Moir Personal pages. 15 November 2006.
- "Mystery humming sound captured". Sydney Morning Herald. 17 November 2006.
- "Mysterious humming driving Aucklanders 'bonkers'". New Zealand Herald. 27 October 2006.
- "Have you heard 'the Hum'?". BBC News. 19 May 2009.
- Brown, Jonathan (July 2011). "In search of the thing that goes hum in the night". The Independent.
- "Who, What, Why: Why is 'the hum' such a mystery?". BBC News. 13 June 2011.
- Leventhall, H. G. (2004). "Low frequency noise and annoyance". Noise & Health 6 (23): 59–72.
- Cowan, J. P. (October 2003). "The Kokomo Hum investigation" (PDF). Acentech Project No. 615411 (Cambridge, MA: Accentech Incorporated).
- Broner, N. (1978). "The effects of low frequency noise on people—A review". Journal of Sound and Vibration 58: 483–500. Bibcode:1978JSV....58..483B. doi:10.1016/0022-460x(78)90354-1.
- Vasudevan, R. N.; Gordon, C. G. (1997). "Experimental study of annoyance due to low frequency environmental noise". Applied Acoustics 10 (1): 57–69.
- Frosch, F. G. (2013). "Hum and otoacoustic emissions may arise out of the same mechanisms". Journal of Scientific Exploration 27 (4): 603–624.
- Deming, David (2004). "The Hum: An anomalous sound heard around the world". Journal of Scientific Exploration 18 (4): 571–594.
- "Low-frequency 'hum' may permeate the environment". New Scientist. 9 December 1989. p. 27.
- "Can some people hear the jet stream?". New Scientist. 8 November 1973. pp. 415–416.
- "Expert says hum is not a sound". Kokomo Tribune. 3 June 2004. pp. 1&12.
- "Expert says hum is not a sound". Hum Forum. 3 June 2004.
- "‘The Hum’ followup: CalPortland installs second silencer, hopes that’s the fix". West Seattle Blog. 7 December 2012.
- "Wellington hum disappears". 3 News. 16 October 2012.
- "Singapore's frigate 'Stalwart' source of Wellington hum?". 3 News. 11 October 2012.
- "Report: Windsor Hum Likely From Zug Island "Blast Furnace Operations"". windsoriteDOTca. 23 May 2014.
- "What's that terrible noise?". The Independent. 22 June 1994.
- "Tinnitus". American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.
- "I'm plagued by a 'hum' that no one else hears". Mail Online. 27 October 2009.
- "Expert has the answer to Woodland village hums". The Advertiser Series. 23 August 2011.
- Tinnitus: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Wiley-Blackwell. 2013. p. 244. ISBN 1-86156-403-1.
- Abrams, M. (October 1995). "An Inescapable Buzz". Discover Magazine. p. 20.
- "In Taos, Researchers Can Hum It, but They Can't Name That Sound". LA Times. 1 September 1993.
- "Taoseños' Ears Still Humming". Albuquerque Journal. 9 December 2007.
- "Seattle 'Hum' May Be Due To Midshipman Fish That Produce Sound For Mating". The Huffington Post. 7 September 2012.
- "Humming Toadfish Are the Buzz of Sausalito". NBC. 16 June 1986.
- "West Seattle’s now-famous ‘Hum’: Apparently NOT a fish’s fault". West Seattle Blog. 11 September 2012.
- "Mystery hum keeping people awake may be love-making fish". The Daily Telegraph. 23 October 2013.
- "Southampton Water mystery droning prompts more moaning". BBC News. 24 October 2013.
- "Minutes of a meeting of the New Forest Environmental Protection Liaison Committee" (PDF). New Forest District Council. 7 February 2014. p. 4.
- Unsolved Mysteries: Ghosts (DVD). First Look Studios. 2005.
- "Spooky! The Top 10 Unexplained Phenomena". LiveScience. 10 January 2007.
- "In A Tiny English Town, A 'Hum' Pierces Each Night". NPR. 15 June 2011.
- "Drive". Ten Thirteen Productions. The X Files. November 15, 1998. Event occurs at 40:00.
- "What's that noise?". The Guardian. October 18, 2001.
- Moorhouse, Andy; Waddington, David; Adams, Mags (February 2005). "Procedure for the assessment of low frequency noise complaints" (PDF). Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford.
- Leventhall, Geoff. "Coping Strategies". Defra.
- especially "Development of a course in computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy" (PDF). 2009.
- and "Coping Strategies for Low Frequency Noise" (PDF). 2008.